1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.502 OF 2021
Between:
Nabros Transport Pvt. Ltd.
SF-1, "Panorama" R.C. Dutt Road,
Vadodara - 390005
Gujarat, India
Represented by its Director
Jignesh Patel.
…Petitioner
(By Smt. Ayushi Agarwal, Advocate)
And:
Bangalore Development Authority,
Having its registered Office at
T. Chowdaiah Road,
Kumara Park West,
Bangalore - 560020
Represented by the Executive Engineer,
Infrastructure Division II.
…Respondent
(By Sri. Ajay Kumar M., Advocate)
****
This C.M.P. is filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint the sole Arbitrator
to constitute the Arbitral Tribunal and refer the disputes to the
Arbitral Tribunal as per Contract Agreement dated 12-03-2013,
vide Annexure G1, award costs incurred in filing the present
petition to the petitioner and pass such other and further order(s)
as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case.
This C.M.P. coming for Admission, through physical
hearing/video conferencing, this day, the Court made the
following:
2
The present petition under Section 11 (5) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed by the
petitioner-
Nabros
Transport
Pvt.Ltd.
against
the
respondent- Bangalore Development Authority, seeking
appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in pursuance of Arbitration
Clause of the Contract Agreement dated 12.03.2013 vide
Annexure-G1.
2. Clause 24 - 'Procedure for resolution of Disputes'
in Conditions of Contract attached to the Contract
Agreement dated 12-03-2013 at Annexure G1 reads as
under:
24. Procedure for resolution of Disputes:
24.1 If the Contractor is not satisfied with the
decision taken by the Employer, the dispute shall be
referred by either party to Arbitration within 30 days
of the notification of the Employer's decision.
24.2 If neither party refers the dispute to Arbitration
within the above 30 days, the Employer's decision
will be final and binding.
3
24.3 The Arbitration shall be conducted in
accordance with the arbitration procedure stated in
the Special Conditions of Contract.
Sl.No.4 of the Special Conditions of Contract
attached to the Contract Agreement dated 12-03-2013 at
Annexure G1 reads as under:-
"4.
Arbitration (Clause 24)
“4.1 The procedure for arbitration shall be as
follows:
(a) In case of dispute or difference arising between
the Employer and the Contractor relating to any
matter arising out of or connected with this
agreement it shall be settled in accordance with the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The disputes
or differences shall be referred to a Sole Arbitrator.
The Sole Arbitrator shall be appointed by the
Commissioner, BDA, out of panel of arbitrators (who
shall be a Engineer) of Indian Council of Arbitration
or Indian Road Congress or National Highways
Authority of India.
(b)
Arbitration proceedings shall be held at
Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
(c)
The
cost
and
expenses
of
arbitration
proceedings will be paid as determined by the
Arbitrator. However the expenses incurred by each
party
in
connection
with
the
preparation,
4
presentation, etc., shall be borne by each party
itself.
(d)
Performance
under
the
contract
shall
continue during the arbitration proceedings and
payments due to the contractor by the Employer
shall not be withheld, unless they are the subject
matter of the arbitration proceedings."
3.
The material on record discloses that since
disputes arose between the parties in relation to the
aforesaid Contract Agreement dated 12.03.2013 containing
the aforesaid Arbitration agreement at Sl.No.4 in the
Special Conditions of Contract attached to the Contract
Agreement, on 11.05.2021, the petitioner invoked the
aforesaid arbitration clause and issued a notice to the
respondent putting forth various claims and contentions
and nominating and appointing a sole arbitrator and calling
upon the respondent to give its concurrence / consent to
refer the dispute to arbitration. However, despite having
received the said notice, the respondent has neither sent
any reply nor complied with the requests and demands
made in the aforesaid arbitration notice.
5
4.
Subsequently, the parties have not only failed
to resolve their disputes but they have also not reached any
consensus / agreement for appointment of an arbitrator and
as such, petitioner is before this Court by way of the
present petition.
5.
In
view
of
the
aforesaid
facts
and
circumstances, though several contentions have been
urged by both sides in support of their respective claims,
without expressing any opinion on the merits / demerits of
the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to allow
this petition by referring the dispute between the parties to
arbitration with the consent of both sides by appointing
Hon’ble Justice V. Jagannathan, Former Judge, High
Court of Karnataka, to act as the sole Arbitrator to resolve
the dispute between the parties under the provisions of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as per the Rules
governing the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic
& Internat