SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. SHEELA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Petitioner is before this Court calling in question the

proceedings

in

C.C.No.630/2016

pending

before

the

II

Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Arakalgudu, Hassan.

2. Heard Sri.Nagaraju.G.S., learned counsel for petitioner

and Sri.S.H.Shankar, learned High Court Government Pleader

for respondent No.1.

3. The issue in the lis is with regard to whether

cognizance could have been taken by the concerned Court for

offence punishable under Sections 408 and 409 r/w Section 34

- 3 -

of the IPC in the absence of a sanction under Section 197 of the

Cr.P.C.

4. The learned counsel for petitioner places reliance upon

a judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered in

Crl.P.No.5594/2019 wherein the Co-ordinate Bench by its

order dated 04.07.2022 following the judgment of the Apex

Court in the case of D.DEVARAJA v. OWAIS SABEER

HUSSAIN reported in (2020) 7 SCC 695 quashing the

proceedings for want of sanction, has held as follows:

“….

….

….

6. A perusal of the charge sheet indicates that

the same has been laid before the jurisdictional

Magistrate without obtaining sanction as specified under

Section 197 of Cr.P.C. Section 197 of Cr.P.C. specifies

that no Court shall take cognizan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top