1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
R.F.A.No. 1307 OF 2005 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SIDDA GANGAMMA
W/O LATE GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/AT.NO. U11(NEW), 9TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN
MARIYAPPANAPALYA, MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 028.
SINCE DEAD BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1(A)
PRAKASH G.,
S/O GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT NO. 27, 4TH MAIN
9TH CROSS, BETTAMMA CIRCLE
K.P.AGRAHARA, BENGALURU NORTH
MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023.
1(B)
SUMA W/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT 4/1, I 'A' MAIN ROAD
22ND CROSS, K.P.AGRAHARA
BENGALURU - 560 023.
1(C)
DEEPAK GOWDA T
S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
R/AT 4/1, I 'A' MAIN ROAD
22ND CROSS, K.P.AGRAHARA
BENGALURU - 560 023.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
1.
SRI. M.U. MOTHIWALA
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S
1(A)
MRS. HAWA BAI MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS
R/AT NO.963, NANAPETH
PUNE - 411 002.
1(B)
MR. ISMAIL MOHAMMAD MOTIWALA
S/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/AT NO.963, NANAPETH
PUNE - 411 002.
1(C ) MR. ASIF MOHAMMAD MOTIWALA
S/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.963, NANAPETH
PUNE - 411 002.
1(D)
MR. ASLAM MOHAMMAD MOTIWALA
S/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/AT NO.963, NANAPETH
PUNE - 411 002.
1(E)
MR. RIYAZ MOHAMMAD MOTIWALA
S/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT NO.964, 10TH B LANE
BENGALURU - 560 010.
1(F)
MRS. ISHRAT ASHFAQ NAKUDA
D/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT NO.104, MAYUR PANKH A1
OPPOSITE SHETAL PETROL PUMP
KONDHWA KHURD
PUNE - 411 048.
1(G)
MRS. JAMEELA SALIM SAIT
D/O LATE HAJEE MOHAMMAD USMAN MOTIWALA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
3
FLAT NO.303, GURUKRUPA HOUSING SOCIETY
NO.2, 3RD FLOOR, BHAWANIPETH,
PUNE - 411 042.
(Since dead, deleted vide Court order dated 03.08.2022)
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. ASWATHANARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER IN O.S.NO. 2080/90 DT: 17.06.2005 ON
THE FILE OF I ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU CITY (CCH NO.2) DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT /
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Both the parties have filed a joint compromise petition
embodying all the terms and conditions of the compromise
entered into between the L.Rs. of the deceased appellant and
L.Rs. of the deceased respondent.
2. The said compromise petition is duly signed by
appellant No.1(a), (b) and (c) and by their learned counsel,
who identifies the appellants. So also, the compromise petition
is duly signed by the respondent No.1(e) for himself and also
4
as GPA holder of the remaining respondents and by his
learned counsel, who identifies the respondent No.1(e).
3. The said compromise petition reads as under:-
MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE PETITION
FILED UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 READ WITH
SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
The Appellants and Respondents herein submit as
follows:
1. The above appeal is filed challenging the
Judgment and decree passed by trial court dated
17.06.2005 passed in O.S.No.2080/1990 in decreeing
the suit.
2. During the pendency of the above appeal, with the
intervention of the family members and after mutual
discussions, the parties have decided to put a quietus
to the litigation and have arrived at a compromise. In
furtherance thereto the parties have executed this
compromise petition.
THE
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS
OF
THE
COMPROMISE ARE AS FOLLOWS:
a. The appellants and the respondents shall have
50% share each in the schedule Property along with
the construction put up thereon.
5
b. The appellants and respondents have jointly
prepared a sketch bifurcating the schedule property
equally as schedule A and B property and the same is
produced along with this compromise petition and
shall form part and parcel of this petition.
c. The appellants shall be the absolute owners in
possession and enjoyment of half of the schedule
property which is morefully set out in the sketch
attached to this compromise and shown in red color
referred to as schedule ‘A’ property.
d. The appellants shall execute a sale deed in favour
of the respondents whereby the respondents shall be
the absolute owners in possession and enjoyment of
half of the schedule property which is morefully set
out in the Sketch attached to this compromise and
shown in blue color referred to as schedule ‘B’
property.
e. The appellants shall be entitled to peacefully enjoy
their 50 % share i.e. Schedule ‘A’ property and shall
be entitled to deal with it as the absolute owner
thereof. Similarly the respondents shall be entitled to
enjoy their 50% share ie. Schedule B Property and
shall be entitled to deal with it as the absolute owner
thereof.
f. The parties confirm that all disputes between the
appellants and respondents are fully and finally
6
resolved. Neither the appellants nor the respondents
shall have any claim whatsoever against each other
and the property of the other.
g. The appellants agree that the schedule ‘B’ property
which will be conveyed to the respondents herein
under this compromise petition is towards full and
final settlement and no amount whatsoever is payable
by the appellants or vice-versa. The Appellants shall
take steps to obtain latest khatha and tax paid receipt
and subsequent thereto shall execute the Registered
Sale Deed in favour of the Respondents in respect of
Schedule-B property on or before 31/08/2022 without
fail and without resorting to execution proceedings.
The stamp duty and registration cost of the sale deed
to be executed in favour of the respondents shall be
borne by the respondents. However the appellants
have agreed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards
stamp duty and registration charges.
h. The parties shall be entitled to mutate their names
in the Khatha and other registers of the BBMP, BDA
and other authorities.
j. The parties have entered into this compromise
petition voluntarily out of their own free will and
without any force, coercion or influence of any person.
7
k.
That
the
Appellants
hereto
assure
that
amongst themselves neither of them have done any
act whereby the schedule ‘A’ and ‘B’ properties
m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.