HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI. SHANTHAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
O R D E R
Heard Shri S.P. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. It is stated that the second respondent, a Police Inspector, has filed a complaint at 11.15 a.m. on 21.01.2014 alleging offences punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, alleging that the petitioners were in the process of transporting bags of food-grains containing rice in a tankar model 909 vehicle, contrary to law and it was suspected that the food-grains were brought from Karnataka Anna Bhagya Scheme. On those allegations of the second respondent who is said to be Police Inspector who was said to be on patrol duty, a case has been registered and the vehicle carrying the food-grains has been seized. It is this which is under challenge in the present petitions.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Paragraph 19 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Control Order, 1992 provides as follows:
“19. Powers of Entry, Search, Seizure, etc.: (1) The Director of Food and Civil Supplies, the Joint Directors of Food and Civil Supplies, or the Tahsildar of a taluk, and Authorized Authority or any other officer of the Department
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.