HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
SRI K SUBRAMANAYA S/O KARIAYAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI T H APPAJI S/O SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA – Respondent
CRL.RP/664/2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
CRL.R.P. No. 664 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
SRI. K. SUBRAMANAYA
S/O. KARIAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT. NO.111/121
C/O. V.V. RAJASHEKAR
SRI. RANGASWAMY NILAYA
6TH CROSS, SESHADRI LAYOUT
MANJUNATHANAGAR,
BAGALAKUNTE
BENGALORE.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.K. BHASKARAIAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. T.H. APPAJI
S/O. SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
R/AT. NO.1851, 19TH CROSS
20TH MAIN, MAGADI ROAD,
(CHORD ROAD), VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A.N. RADHAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS CRL. R.P. IS FILED U/S 397 R/W. 401 CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE
ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAST TRACK COURT-XIV,
BANGALORE CITY IN CRL.A. NO. 720/2020, DATED
07.04.2011 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE
XXII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
AND
XXIV
ADDITIONAL
SMALL
CAUSES
JUDGE,
BENGALURU
CITY
IN
C.C.
NO.21683/2007,
DATED
29.09.2010.
THIS CRL.R.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though this petition is listed today for orders,
the same is taken up for final disposal having regard
to the facts and circumstances of the case.
2.
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed by
the petitioner under Section 397 read with Section
401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated
07.04.2011 passed in Crl.A. No.720/2010 passed by
the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-XIV,
Bengaluru City, wherein the appeal came to be
dismissed confirming the judgment of conviction and
order of sentence passed by the learned XXII
3
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and XXIV
Additional Small Causes Judge, Bengaluru City, in
C.C.No.21683/2007 on 29.09.2010.
3.
In order to avoid confusion and over-
lapping, parties are addressed in accordance with their
ranks and status before the trial Court.
4.
The substance of the complaint is extracted
from the certified copy of the judgment passed in
C.C.No.21683/2007 is as under :
"It is narrated in the complaint that,
complainant and accused are family friends.
The accused approached the complainant in
October
2005
and
borrowed
loan
of
Rs.12,00,000/- by cash to contest in the
Panchayath Election and to do business and
agreed to repay within three months with
interest at 2% p.m. The accused has issued a
cheque
bearing
No.824628,
dated:
27.03.2006 for a sum of Rs.12,00,000/-
drawn on Canara Bank, Rajajinagar, I Block
Branch, Bangalore. So the complainant
presented the cheque through his banker,
Janatha Seva Co-Operative Bank Limited.,
Vijayanagar Branch, Bangalore. The same
was dishonoured for the reasons "PAYMENT
4
STOPPED BY DRAWER" on 05.04.2006. the
complainant issued a legal notice to the
accused on 17.04.2006 through RPAD and
UCP. The notice sent to Tumkur address
returned unserved with postal shara "Party
left to Bangalore'. The notice sent to
Bangalore address returned unserved on
28.04.2006 with postal shara 'Door locked'.
The notice sent by UCP served on the
accused. Hence, the complaint".
5.
Before the learned trial Judge, learned trial
Judge took cognizance of the offence and issued
summons to the accused. After receipt of summons
accused appeared and released on bail. Plea of the
accused was recorded, he pleaded not guilty and
claims to be tried.
6.
Before the trial Judge was accommodated
with oral and documentary evidence as under:
List of witnesses examined for complainant :
PW.1
:
T.H. Appaji
PW.2
:
Harish Babu
5
List of witnesses examined for accused
DW.1
:
K. Subramani
DW.2
:
R. Anandi
DW.3
:
K.Eshwarappa
List of documents marked for complainant :
Ex.P.1
-
Complaint
Ex.P.2
-
Cheque
Ex.P.3
-
Bank endorsement
Ex.P.4
-
Le