SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
WINNER LAND RECREATION ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


O R D E R

The Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondents.

2. The petition is considered for final disposal, at the stage of preliminary hearing, having regard to the facts of the case.

3. The petitioner is said to be an Association registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. It is stated that the aim and objective of the petitioner is to provide recreation facilities to its members to engage in indoor and outdoor games. However, it is the grievance of the petitioner that respondent Nos.2 to 6 are constantly visiting the petitioner’s premises on the pretext of surveillance on the allegations of illegal activities being carrying on in the premises, which is wholly incorrect and misleading. Therefore, the petitioners are before this Court, complaining against the alleged harassment by the respondents.

4. In similar matters before this Court, this Court has issued certain guidelines. Therefore, the petition is disposed of issuing the following guidelines.

“(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CCTV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games are played b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top