HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
SMT RATHNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
MRS ZEENATHUNISA – Respondent
RFA/1435/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.F.A.No.1435 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
Smt.Rathnamma
W/o K.Muniappa
Aged about 49 years,
R/at Site No.442 (Old No.53),
10th Cross, Chowdeshwari Nagar,
Bangalore-560 056.
.. Appellant
( By Sri K.Chandrashekar Achar, Advocate )
AND:
Mrs.Zeenathunisa
W/o Late S.M.Latheef Khan,
Aged about 93 years,
R/at.No.G 103,
Old Township, HAL Colony,
Vimanapura City,
Bangalore-560 017.
Since deceased, Rep.by Legal Heirs,
1(a) Sri Anwar Ali Khan,
S/o late S.M.Latheef Khan,
Aged Major,
R/at.No.G 103,
Old Township, HAL Colony,
RFA.No.1435/2014
2
Vimanapura City,
Bengaluru-560 017.
1(b) Zareena,
D/o late S.M.Latheef Khan,
W/o Chowdhari Mazharul Haq,
Aged Major,
R/at.No.G 103,
Old Township, HAL Colony,
Vimanapura City,
Bengaluru-560 017.
.. Respondents
( By Sri V.Anand, Advocate for
C/R & for proposed R-1(b),
Vide order dated 1.3.2017, notice
To R-1(a) is held sufficient)
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 read
with Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC against the judgment and
decree dated 6.8.2014, passed in O.S.No.6275/2007 on the
file of VII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-
19), dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent
injunction.
This Regular First Appeal having been heard and
reserved for judgment on 18.12.2019, this day the Court
delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
It is the plaintiff’s appeal. The present appellant as
a plaintiff has instituted a suit against the original
respondent Smt.Zeenathunisa herein for the relief of
perpetual injunction in O.S.No.6275/2007, in the Court
RFA.No.1435/2014
3
of learned VII Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bengaluru, (CCH-19), (hereinafter for brevity referred to
as `trial Court’).
2. The summary of the case of the plaintiff in the
trial Court was that she had purchased the suit schedule
property, which is a residential house bearing No.53 and
formed in Survey No.52, Assessment No.52, measuring
50’
x
30’,
and
situated
at
Laggere
Village
of
Yeshwanthpur Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, now called
as
Chowdeshwarinagar,
Bengaluru-560053,
on
6.10.2003, from one Sri Gangaiah, represented by his
General
Power
of
Attorney
Holder
Smt.Jayaramachandra. Thereafter, on 1.12.2003, she
constructed a residential building and obtained electrical
connection and other amenities to the property. The
defendant had filed O.S.No.5819/2003, against one
Sri Ramesh E.S. and Smt.K.M.Saraswathi, for the relief
RFA.No.1435/2014
4
of bare injunction with respect to site Nos.53 and 54,
measuring 46’ x 52’ and obtained an ex parte decree on
2.7.2004.
It is the further contention of the plaintiff in the
trial Court that the defendant Smt.Zeenathunisa had
also filed one more suit in O.S.No.16818/2005, against
the
very
same
Sri
Ramesh
E.S.
and
Smt.K.M.Saraswathi,
for
the
relief
of
declaration,
possession and mandatory injunction in respect of both
site Nos.53 and 54 and obtained an ex parte judgment
and decree on 16.1.2007. According to the plaintiff, in
the trial Court both those persons i.e., Sri Ramesh E.S.
and Smt.K.M.Saraswathi were fictitious persons and it
was a collusive suit filed without impleading the plaintiff
who has been in possession of the property. Finally an
Execution Petition No.25074/2007 was filed before the
competent Court and the defendant herein obtained
delivery warrant against the judgment debtors i.e.,
RFA.No.1435/2014
5
Ramesh E.S. and Smt.K.M.Saraswathi. However, on
28.7.2007, the defendant in collusion with the Court
Ameen and taking the police help, approached the
plaintiff in the suit schedule property and threatened
th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.