1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
W.A. NO.1426 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
IN
W.P.No.3690 OF 2016 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
HOTEL BASANT RESORTS
AND HOTELS (I) P. LTD
NO.3, 4TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REP. BY SRI. BASANT KUMAR PATIL
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
... APPELLANT
(BY MR. H.R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
MINISTRY OF TOURISM
(H AND R DIVISION)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
C-1, HUTMENTS, DALHOUSIE ROAD
NEW DELHI-110 011
REP. BY ITS ASSTT. DG (H AND R).
2
2.
KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL
INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED
MSIL HOUSE, NO.36, CUNNINGHAM ROAD
BENGALURU-560052.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MRS. SAROJINI MUTHANNA K, ADV., FOR R1)
- - -
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO-
3690/2016 (GM-RES) DATED 18.10.2021 IN DISMISSING THE
WRIT PETITION AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL. ISSUE
SUITABLE DIRECTION TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT MINISTRY
OF TOURISM (H R DIVISION) TO RELEASE THE INTEREST
SUBSIDY AS CLAIM IN THE WP.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
This intra Court appeal has been filed against
the order dated 18.10.2021 passed by the learned
Single Judge by which the writ petition preferred by
the appellant has been dismissed.
3
2. Facts giving rise to the filing of this appeal
briefly stated are that the appellant is a Company
incorporated under the provisions of the erstwhile
Companies Act and interest subsidy scheme was
framed by the Central Government with effect from
01.04.2002. Under the aforesaid scheme, all new
hotel projects which were approved by the Central
Government on or before 31.03.2002, were entitled to
the benefit under the scheme. The appellant's
proposal for grant of interest subsidy was made in the
year 2005 i.e. much beyond the cut off date. The
claim of the appellant for grant of interest subsidy was
rejected by an order dated 21.09.2015 passed by the
Ministry of Tourism, Government of India for the
following reasons:
"i) The Ministry of Tourism, Govt. of India
discontinued
the
Scheme
of
Interest
4
Subsidy with effect from 01.04.2002 for all
the new hotel projects.
ii) However, it was decided that all the
eligible hotel projects approved by the
Department on or before 31.03.2002 would
continue to avail interest subsidy as per the
then Scheme.
iii) Each Scheme in the Govt. of India is
first
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission/Ministry
of
Finance
and
accordingly a suitable fund is allocated for
this purpose.
iv) All the Scheme are launched for a
particular period and these are reviewed
from time to time. As public money are
involved, it is important to ensure that these
are utilised with utmost care.
v)
Further, Govt. of India, Ministry of
Tourism launched a new Scheme of "Capital
Subsidy" in place of Interest Subsidy.
5
vi) The proposal for grant of Interest
subsidy was received from Hotel Basant
Resorts & Hotels (I) Pvt. Ltd, Bengaluru in
May 2005, i.e., after more than three years
after the closure of the Scheme of Interest
Subsidy by the Govt. of India, Ministry of
Tourism.
vii) The interest Subsidy proposal made by
the hotel Basant Resorts & Hotels (I) Pvt.
Ltd., Bengaluru was considered in the
Ministry
of
Tourism
Govt.
of
India
thoroughly in consultation with Integrated
Finance Division of the Ministry
and
keeping in view of the aforesaid facts the
proposal was not agreed to."
The appellant has assailed the aforesaid order in
a writ petition which has been dismissed by the
learned Single Judge.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has invited
the attention of this Court to communication between
6
the respondent No.1 and respondent No.2 and has
submitted that the benefit of interest subsidy ought to
have been granted to the appellant under the scheme.
4. We have considered the submissions made by
the learned counsel for the parties and have perused
the record. Admittedly, the cut off date for grant of
benefit
under
the
interest
subsidy
scheme
is
01.04.2002. In other words, all eligible hotel projects
which
have
been
approved
by
the
Tourism
Department on or before 31.03.2002, are entitled to
benefit of interest subsidy. The proposal for the hotel
project of the appellant was received in May 2005 i.e.
more than 3 years after the closure of the scheme.
The Government of India,
in its order dated
21.09.2015, has assigned valid and cogent reasons for
rejection of claim of the appellant for interest subsidy.
The aforesaid order has rightly been upheld by the
learned Single Judge. We therefore, do not find any
7
ground to differ with the view taken by the learned
Single Judge.
In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby
dismissed.
Sd/-
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV