SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ
SRI C.C.CHALUVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
SMT K S HEMALATHA – Respondent
MFA/8021/2014



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA

AND

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

M.F.A. NO.8021 OF 2014 (FC)

C/W

M.F.A. NO.71 OF 2015 (FC)

IN MFA No.8021/2014:

BETWEEN:

SRI. C.C.CHALUVARAJU

S/O CHINNEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

R/O CHEERANAKUPPE,

VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,

KANAKAPURA TALUK-562 117,

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT.

… APPELLANT

(BY SRI. KRISHNA B.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. K.S.HEMALATHA

W/O C.C.CHALUVARAJU,

D/O SRINIVASAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.36,

17TH ‘C’ CROSS

38TH MAIN, ROSE GARDEN,

J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE,

BANGALORE-560 078.

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT

NO.444, VASANTHA NILAYA,

2

BENDRE STREET, B.M. EXTENSION,

KANAKAPURA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 120.

….RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE FOR

CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE

FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND

DECREE DATED 27.09.2014 PASSED IN MC NO.3689/2011 ON

THE

FILE

OF

THE

PRINCIPAL

JUDGE,

FAMILY

COURT,

BANGALORE,

DISMISSING

THE

PETITION

FILED

UNDER

SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.

IN MFA NO.71/2015:

BETWEEN:

SMT. K.S.HEMALATHA

W/O C.C.CHELUVARAJU

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

R/O NO.36, 17TH ‘C’ CROSS,

38TH MAIN, ROSE GARDEN,

J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE,

BANGALORE;

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT

NO.44, VASANTHA NILAYA,

B.M.EXTENSION,

KANAKAPURA,

RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 117.

… APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. C.C.CHALUVARAJU

S/O CHINNEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

R/O CHEERANAKUPPE VILLAGE

KASABA HOBLI,

KANAKAPURA HOBLI-562 117

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT.

….RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B.R. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)

3

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE

FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND

DECREE DATED 27.09.2014 PASSED IN M.C NO.3689/2011 ON

THE

FILE

OF

THE

PRINCIPAL

JUDGE,

FAMILY

COURT,

BANGALORE,

DISMISSING

THE

PETITION

FILED

UNDER

SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 FOR

DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.

THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

NATARAJ RANGASWAMY J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Though MFA No.8021/2014 is listed today for Orders

regarding non-compliance of objections on an interlocutory

application, as the records of the Trial Court are received,

it is taken up along with the connected appeal - MFA

No.71/2015 for final disposal, with the consent of the

learned counsel for the parties.

2.

MFA No.8021/2014 is filed challenging the

Judgment and Decree dated 27.09.2014 passed by

Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore in M.C.No.3689/

2011 by which, a petition filed by the appellant for divorce

was dismissed.

3.

MFA

No.71/2015

is

filed

by

the

wife

challenging the quantum of maintenance awarded by

Principal

Judge,

Family

Court,

Bangalore

in

M.C.No.3689/2011.

4

4.

The parties shall henceforth be referred to as

appellant-husband and respondent-wife respectively.

5.

The appellant-husband filed a petition for

divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1955 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for short) alleging

cruelty by the respondent-wife. The facts pleaded by the

husband in his petition before the Trial Court are, he had

married

the

respondent-wife

on

21.05.1998

at

Sri

Chamundeswari

Kalyana

Mantapa,

Kanakapura.

He

claimed that she was not cordial towards him and his

family members and was reluctant to perform her duties

as a wife and had no respect for him and his family

members. He claimed that despite her behaviour, he

continued to show love and affection towards her, but yet

she did not alter her behaviour. She started demanding

the petitioner to set up an independent accommodation at

Bangalore.

Accordingly,

he

established

a

home

at

Bangalore and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top