PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MR SIDDA – Appellant
Versus
VARADANAYAKA @ VARADAIAH – Respondent
This matter is listed for admission and I have heard the
learned counsel for the appellant.
2.
This appeal is filed against the judgment and
decree dated 04.04.2017 passed in R.A.No.12/2016 on the file
of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kollegala, dismissing the
appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated
19.12.2015 passed in O.S.No.53/2009 on the file of the
Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kollegala.
3.
The appellant-plaintiff has filed the suit for the relief
of declaration of possessory rights and consequential relief of
permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering
with the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit
schedule property.
4.
The defendant appeared and filed the written
statement before the Trial Court and the Trial Court having
considering both oral and documentary evidence i.e., the
evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 and D.W.1 and Exs.P1 to 44,
considered the matter on merits and comes to the conclusion
that, earlier the plaintiff had also filed the suit for the relief of
- 3 -
permanent injunction and not proved the possession and
hence, the suit was dismissed. Against the said judgment, he
also filed the appeal before the Senior
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.