SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
MOHAMMAD ZABI ULLA (ZABEE) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/4279/2016



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4279 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

MOHAMMAD ZABI ULLA (ZABEE)

S/O LATE ABDUL GHANI,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

R/AT # 86/7 DEVANGA BEEDI

BAZAR STREET, NELAMANAGALA

BENGALURU RURAL-562123

... PETITIONER

(BY SMT : SREEVIDHYA B S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

VIDYARANYAPURA POLICE STATION,

BENGALURU -560097

R/BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BENGALURU-560001

2.

SUSHEELA DEVI

W/O: MANGAL RAMJI,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

R/AT NO.13-14, CHIKKABETTAHALLLI,

HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,

VIDYARANYAPURA

2

BENGALURU-560097

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI: I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH

THE FIR OF CR.NO.317/2015 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BY

THE RESPONDENT NO.1 - POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 427,447,506(B) R/W 34 OF IPC

AND SEBSEQUENT INVETIGATION BY THE POLICE.

THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No

representation.

Perused the petition.

2. The petitioner has sought to quash the FIR in

Cr.No.317/2015 registered for the offences punishable under

sections 427, 447, 506(B) r/w 34 Indian Penal Code.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SPP-II

appearing for respondent No.1-State submits that after completion

of investigation, charge sheet is laid against the petitioner before

the jurisdictional Court. His submission is placed on record.

3

In view of the above submission, reserving liberty to the

petitioner to seek his discharge on such ground available under law,

the petition is dismissed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

In view of dismissal of the main matter, I.A.No.1/2016 for

stay does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

*mn/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top