HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
RAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP/189/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.189 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
1.
RAJU S/O RAMALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST
2.
LOHIT KUMAR,
S/O RAMALINGAPPA, 30 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST, BOTH RESIDENTS OF
KUNKANADU VILLAGE, KADUR TALUK,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 182.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S.G.BHAGAWAN, ADV.,)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PANCHANAHALLY POLICE,
PANCHANAHALLY POLICE STATION,
KADUR TALUK,
CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRUCT,
REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP)
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET-
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE
DATED
29.01.2015
PASSED
BY
THE
PRL.S.J.,
CHIKKAMAGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.7/2013, IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO CONFIRMING JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE DATED 28.12.2012 PASSED BY THE C.J. AND
J.M.F.C., KADUR IN C.C.NO.970/2010 AND CONVICTING AND
SENTENCING
THE
PETITIONERS
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323 AND 325 READ WITH
SECTION 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR
FINAL
HEARING,
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The accused persons are in revision against the order
passed in C.C.No.970/2010 whereby, the accused persons are
convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323
and 326 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short
‘IPC’) and were ordered to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and
sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for
the offences punishable under Sections 504 and 323 of IPC
and sentenced six months imprisonment for the offence
punishable under Section 326 of IPC and three years simple
imprisonment with fine and default sentence which was
3
modified by the Principal District Judge in Crl.A.No.7/2013 by
judgment dated 29.01.2015 whereby accused persons were
convicted for the offence punishable under Section 325 read
with Section 34 of IPC and ordered for simple imprisonment
for six months with fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 325 of
IPC and in default, they were sentenced for simple
imprisonment for one month and out of the fine amount,
Rs.3,000/- as ordered to be paid as compensation under
Section 357 of Cr.P.C.
2.
The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of
the revision petition are as under:
3.
A complaint came to be filed which is registered in
Crime No.54/2010 alleging that the accused persons have
voluntarily caused grievous hurt to Sri G. Marulasiddappa-
complainant on 16.09.2010 at about 8.30 p.m, in the night,
near the shop of Prakash at Kunkanadu village. On
registration of the case, Panchanahally Police investigated the
matter in detail and filed charge sheet against the accused
4
persons for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324,
326, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.
4.
Learned
Magistrate
took
cognizance
of
the
offences and secured the presence of the accused persons
and after recording the charge, accused persons pleaded not
guilty. Accordingly, the trial was held. In order to prove the
case of the prosecution, eight witnesses were examined as
PWs.1 to 8 and six documents were marked as Exs.P1 to P6
and one Material Object is marked as M.O.1.
5.
On
conclusion of the prosecution evidence,
accused statement was recorded as contemplated under
Section 313 Cr.P.C., wherein the accused persons have
denied the incriminating circumstances. Based on the
material on record, in the right of arguments advanced on by
the parties, the learned Magistrate convicted the accused
persons for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323,
326 read with Section 34 of IPC and sentenced the accused