1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
M.F.A.NO.5156 OF 2015 (MV)
C/W
M.F.A.NO.5157 OF 2015 (MV)
IN M.F.A.NO.5156 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
PINTU CHUG @ PINTU ARORA
@ SURENDRA CHUG
S/O UTTAM CHAND
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
OCC: BUSINESSMAN
R/O VASAVIMAHAL ROAD
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
… APPELLANT
(BY Smt. VIJAYA M.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KAPIL
S/O GULSHAN LAL
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
MERCHANT, OWNER OF CAR
BEARING REG. NO.KA-16-M-2387
R/O VASAVIMHAL ROAD
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
2.
THE BRANCH MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
BRANCH OFFICE
2
OPPOSITE TO UNION PARK
P.B.ROAD, CHITRADURGA-577 501.
3.
THE BRANCH MANAGER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
OPPOSITE TO KSRTC BUS STAND
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. C.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. H.C.VRUSHABENDRAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE
MOTOR VEHICLE ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED:10.03.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.517/2012 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, C.J.M &
MACT-III, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
IN M.F.A.NO.5157 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
ANISHA
D/O PINTU CHUG @ PINTU ARORA
@ SURENDRA CHUG
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
STUDENT R/O VASAVIMAHAL ROAD
CHITRADURGA-57 501.
… APPELLANT
(BY SMT.VIJAYA M.N., ADVOCATE)
3
AND:
1.
KAPIL
S/O GULSHAN LAL
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
MERCHANT, OWNER OF CAR
BEARING REG. NO.KA-16-M-2387,
R/O VASAVIMHAL ROAD,
CHITRADURGA-577 501
2.
THE BRANCH MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.,
BRANCH OFFICE
OPPOSITE TO UNION PARK
P.B.ROAD,
CHITRADURGA-577 501.
3.
THE BRANCH MANAGER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
OPP:TO KSRTC BUS STAND,
CHITRADURGA-577 501
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. C.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. S.V. HEGDE MULKHAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE
MOTOR VEHICLE ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED:10.03.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.515/2012 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, C.J.M &
MACT-III, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
MFA No.5156/2015 and MFA No.5157/2015 are filed
under Section-173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,
(hereinafter referred to as ‘MV Act’ for brevity) respectively
by the appellants-claimants challenging the judgment and
award dated 10.03.2015, passed in MVC No.515/2012 and
MVC No.517/2012, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil
Judge & MACT-III, Chitradurga, (hereinafter referred to as
‘the
Tribunal’
for
brevity)
seeking
enhancement
of
compensation.
Brief facts of the cases are as follows;
That on 18.06.2006, the appellants and others were
travelling in a car bearing Registration No.KA-16-M-2387
from Holalkere towards Chitradurga near Devapuradahatti
bridge, at that time the driver of the car drove in rash and
negligent manner without observing the traffic rules and
dashed against on coming bus bearing Registration No.KA-
16-B-6116, due to which accident was occurred, appellants
and others were sustained grievous injuries, immediately
appellants
were
admitted
to
Government
Hospital,
5
Chitradurga and further the appellants took treatment from
Manipal Hospital, Bangalore.
Heard arguments of the learned counsel for the
appellants and the learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and
3– insurance companies and perused the materials on
record.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants-
claimants submitted that the quantum of compensation
awarded under various heads is on lesser side. Therefore,
seeks for enhancement of the compensation.
5.
On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing
for the second and third respondents – insurance companies
submit that the Tribunal is justified in passing the impugned
judgment
and
award
and
there
is
no
ground
for
enhancement. That the compensation amount as awarded by
the Tribunal is sufficient and adequate. Therefore, seeks for
dismissal of these appeals.
6
MFA No.5156/2015 (MVC No.517/2012)
6.
In the present case, Ex.P28 is a wound certificate
which shows that the appellant/claimant sustained the
following injuries.
Sl.
No.
Description of injuries
1 Lacerated wound to the left eyebrow
2 Lacerated wound to the chin
3 Contusion tenderness present over left little
finger
4 Contusion and tenderness over right wrist joint
7.
The Tribunal has awarded a global compensation
of Rs.50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the
date of petition till the date of deposit.
8.
The aforesaid injuries did not have any fractures.
Two injuries are grievous in nature. The appellant/claimant
had not produced any medical bills/receipts to show what is
the amount spent towards the medical expenses and hospital
charges and also there is no evidence regarding disability
sustained by the appellant-claimant. Therefore, the Tribunal
has awarded a global compensation of Rs.50,000/- as stated
above. But, considering the facts that the appellant/claimant
have taken treatment in Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru as it is
7
observed in the judgment he has spent a considerable
amount towards treatment, travelling expenses etc., Further
more, among injuries, two injuries are grievous in nature.
Therefore, considering all these factors, it is just and proper
to enhance compensation of Rs.25,000/- marginally.
Therefore, a total Rs.75,000/- (Rs.50,000+Rs.25,000) is
awarded. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to an additional
compensation of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.75,000-Rs.50,000) along
with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the
petition till deposit in addition to what has been awarded by
the Tribunal.
In MFA No.5157/2015 (MVC No.515/2012)
9.
In the present case, the Ex.P.28 is a wound
certificate which proves that the appellant-claimant had
sustained the following injuries.
Sl.No.
Description of injuries
Abrasion over the right ear
Lacerated wound to the right side of face
10.
The Tribunal has awarded a compensation of
Rs.45,000/- globally. The appellant-claimant was studying in
7th standard at the time of the accident. The medical bills
8
produced by the appellant shows that the he had spent
Rs.