SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SRI SYED SIKANDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

WRIT PETITION No.52658/2019 ( LB-RES)

Between:

Sri Syed Sikandar,

S/o Syed Sami,

Aged about 28 years,

Chicken Merchant,

R/at No.2409, 20th Division,

Dargha Mohalla,

Doddaballapur Town – 561 203,

Bangalore Rural District.

… Petitioner

(By Sri S.A. Khadri, Advocate)

And:

1.

The State of Karnataka,

By its Secretary to Government,

Urban Development Department,

M.S. Building,

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Road,

Bangalore – 560 001.

2.

The Housing and Urban Development

Authority,

Vikasa Soudha,

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Road,

Bangalore – 560 001,

Represented by its

Under Secretary to the Government.

2

3.

The City Municipal Council,

Doddaballapur – 561 203,

Bangalore Rural District,

Represented by its Commissioner.

… Respondents

(By Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA for R1 & R2)

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227

of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated

7.1.2019 passed by the R-3 at Annexure-Z and also order

dated 13.11.2019 passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top