SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:40929

CRL.P No. 11029/2023

C/W CRL.P No.11152/2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11029/2023

C/W

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11152/2023

IN CRL.P.No.11029/2023:

BETWEEN:

ILIYAS AHAMED

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

S/O BAKSHI SAB

R/O KARKUCHI VILLAGE

LAKKAVALLI HOBLI

TARIKERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DIST - 577 228.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI RAVIKUMAR N.R, ADV.)

AND:

STATE BY RANGE FOREST OFFICER

LAKKAVALLI RANGE, LAKKAVALLI

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT

REPRESENTED BY STATE

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BANGALORE - 01.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE

PETITIONER ON BAIL IN F.O.C.NO.16/2023-24 REGISTERED BY

R.F.O., LAKKAVALLI RANGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT FOR THE

OFFENCE P/U/S 62, 71A, 84, 86, 104-B OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT

Digitally signed

by B A

KRISHNA

KUMAR

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:40929

CRL.P No. 11029/2023

C/W CRL.P No.11152/2023

AND RULE 144 AND 465 OF KARNATAKA FOREST RULES ON THE FILE

OF J.M.F.C., TARIKERE.

IN CRL.P.No.11152/2023:

BETWEEN:

SRI RAMU

S/O KRISHNAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT44 YEARS

R/O KARAKUCHI VILLAGE

TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU

DIS - 577 101. …PETITIONER

(BY SRI GIRISH B BALADARE, ADV.)

AND:

STATE BY RANGE FOREST OFFICER

LAKAKVALLI RANGE, LAKAKVALLI

CHIKKAMAGALURU DIS - 577 101.

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROECUTOR

HIGH COURT BUILDING

BANGALORE - 560 001.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE

PETITIONER ON BAIL IN FOC NO.16/2023-24 THE CASE IS

REGISTERED

BY

RANGE

FOREST

OFFICE,

LAKKAVALI

RANG,

LAKKAVALLI, CHIKKAMANGALORE DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE

P/U/S 62,71A,84,86,104-B OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT AND

RULE 144 AND 165 OF THE K.F RULES 1969 PENDING ON THE FILE

OF

THE

CIVIL

JUDGE

AND

ADDL.J.M.F.C

AT

TARIKERE.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

- 3 -

NC: 2023:KHC:40929

CRL.P No. 11029/2023

C/W CRL.P No.11152/2023

Accused Nos.2 and 1 in FOC No.16/2023-24 registered

by

the

Range

Forest

Officer,

Lakkavalli

Range,

Chikkamgaluru, for the offence punishable under Sections

62, 71A, 84, 86, 104-B of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

and Rules 144 and 165 of the Karnataka Forest Rules,

1969, are before this Court in these two petitions under

Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3.

It is the case of the prosecution that on

06.09.2023, Range Forest Officials had got a credible

information

that

two

persons

were

transporting

sandalwood and based on said information, they had

intercepted the petitioners, who were travelling in a motor

cycle bearing registration No. KA66-H2267 and from their

possession, 12 kgs 100 grams of sandalwood chips were

recovered and subjected to panchanama.

- 4 -

4.

Thereafter, the apprehended accused were

produced before the jurisdictional Court and remanded to

judicial custody. Their bail application filed before the

Court

of

Principal

District

and

Sessions

Judge,

Chikkamagaluruin Crl. Misc. Petn. No.693/2023 was

rejected on 22.09.2023. Therefore, they are before this

Court.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that

petitioners are in custody since 06.09.2023. Major portion

of the investigation is completed. The contraband article

has already been seized in the present case. Therefore,

the custody of the petitioners is not required. Accordingly,

prays to allow the petitions.

6.

Per contra, learned HCGP opposes the bail

petitions. He submits that accused no.1 has criminal

antecedents and was earlier involved in similar case.

Hence, he prays to dismiss the petitions.

- 5 -

7.

The materials on record would go to show that

based on credible information, accused persons were

intercepted and apprehended and from their possession,

12 kgs 100 grams of sandalwood chips, which they were

carrying in a plastic bag was recovered. The petitioners

are in custody since 06.09.2023. Major portion of the

investigation in the present case is complete and

sandalwood chips, which were allegedly being transported

by the petitioners illegally has been seized and subjected

to panchanama. Accused No.1 as against whom similar

case was pending in S.C.No.14/2020 before District and

Sessions Court, Chikkamagaluru, was acquitted in the said

case vide judgment and order dated 12.09.2023 and

accused No.2 has no criminal antecedents. Under the

circumstances, I am of the view that petitioners have

made out a case for grant of regular bail.

8.

Accordingly, the petitions are allowed. The

petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in in FOC

No.16/2023-24 registered by the Range Forest Officer,

- 6 -

Lakkavalli

Range,

Chikkamgaluru,

for

the

offence

punishable under Sections 62, 71A, 84, 86, 104-B of the

Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144 and 165 of the

Karnataka

Forest

Rules,

subject

to

the

following

conditions:

a)

Petitioners shall execute personal bond for

a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties

for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional Court;

b)

The petitioners shall appear regularly on

all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court

unless the Trial Court exempts their appearance

for valid reasons;

c)

The petitioners shall not directly or

indirectly

threaten

or

tamper

with

the

prosecution witnesses;

d)

The petitioners shall not involve in similar

offences in future;

e)

The

petitioners

shall

not

leave

the

jurisdiction

of

the

Trial

Court

without

- 7 -

permission of the said Court until the case

registered against them is disposed off.

SD/-

JUDGE

DN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top