PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
ILIYAS AHAMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY RANGE FOREST OFFICER – Respondent
Accused Nos.2 and 1 in FOC No.16/2023-24 registered
by
the
Range
Forest
Officer,
Lakkavalli
Range,
Chikkamgaluru, for the offence punishable under Sections
62, 71A, 84, 86, 104-B of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963
and Rules 144 and 165 of the Karnataka Forest Rules,
1969, are before this Court in these two petitions under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3.
It is the case of the prosecution that on
06.09.2023, Range Forest Officials had got a credible
information
that
two
persons
were
transporting
sandalwood and based on said information, they had
intercepted the petitioners, who were travelling in a motor
cycle bearing registration No. KA66-H2267 and from their
possession, 12 kgs 100 grams of sandalwood chips were
recovered and subjected to panchanama.
- 4 -
4.
Thereafter, the apprehended accused were
produced before the jurisdictional Court and remanded to
judicial custody. Their bail application filed before the
Court
of
Principal
District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Chikkamagaluruin Crl. Misc. Petn. No.693/2023 was
rejected on 22.09.2023. Therefore, they are before this
Court.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.