HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. SHAMALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. CHIKKAMUNISHAMI @ TAHYIGA SINCE DECEASED BY – Respondent
WP/40384/2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
W.P.No.40384 OF 2011(SC-ST)
BETWEEN:
1.
Smt. Shamalamma,
W/o Shamanna,
Aged about 75 years,
R/at No.72 Munnekolalu Village,
Varthur Hobli,
Bangalore East Taluk,
Bangalore-560 037.
2.
Sri. M.S.Shankara Reddy,
S/o Shamanna,
Aged about 55 years,
R/at No.23, 4th A Cross,
Near Ashvini Stores,
Munnekolalu Village, Varthur Hobli,
Bangalore East Taluk,
Bangalore-560 037.
… Petitioners
(By Sri.D.N.Nanjunda Reddy, Senior Counsel, for
Sri. Reuben Jacob, Advocate)
AND:
1.
Sri. Chikkamunishami @ Tahyiga,
Since dead by his LR’s.
2
1(a) Sri. Venkataswamy,
S/o Late. Thimmaiah,
Grand son of Sri. Chikkamunishami @ Tahyiga,
R/at Munnekolalu Village,
Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk,
Bangalore-560 037.
2.
Late. Changalaraya,
S/o Late Ganga,
Since deceased by his LRs.
2(a) Sri.C.Muniraju,
S/o Late Changalaraya.
2(b) Sri. C.Balakrishna,
S/o Late Changalaraya.
2(c) Smt. Pushpa,
D/o Late Changalaraya.
2(d) Smt. C. Shakuntala
D/o Late Changalaraya.
2(e) Smt. C. Padma,
D/o Late Changalaraya.
2(f) Sri. C. Mani,
S/o Late Changalaraya.
Since decease his LR’S.
R2(a) to R(f) are children’s of
Late Changalaraya All are R/at,
Munnekolalu Village, Varthur Hobli,
Bangalore East Taluk.
3.
The Special Deputy Commissioner,
Bangalore Urban District,
Bangalore.
3
4.
The Assistant Commissioner,
Bangalore North Sub-Division,
Bangalore.
5.
The Tahsildar,
Bangalore East Taluk,
K R Puram, Bangalore.
... Respondents
(By Sri.Vivek S Reddy, Senior Counsel for
Sri. K.N.Subba Reddy, Advocate for R2(a-f)
Sri. K.Suresh, Advocate for R1(a) & R2(b),
Smt. Savithramma, HCGP. For R3 to R5)
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated:
10.10.2011 passed in SC:ST (A):03/2010-11 by the respondent
No.3 vide Annexure A to the writ petition and dismiss the said
appeal
preferred
by
the
Respondent
Nos.
1
&
2
in
SC:ST(A):03/2010-2011.
This writ petition, coming on for hearing, this day, the
Court, made the following:
ORDER
This writ petition is directed against the order dated
10.10.2011 vide Annexure-A passed by the third respondent
whereby the Special Deputy Commissioner has allowed the
appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original grantee
under Section 5A of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act,
4
1978 (for short, ‘the PTCL Act’) and set aside the order passed
by the Assistant Commissioner.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the land bearing
Sy.No.131 (Old Sy.No.44/2) measuring 2 acres 32 guntas
situated at Munnekolalu Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East
Taluk was originally granted in favour of one Chikkamuniswamy
@ Tayiga under Darkasth Rules on 06.03.1929 and saguvali chit
was issued on 20.05.1942. The original grantee sold the land in
favour of grandfather of the second under a sale deed dated
08,06.1944. From the date of purchase the petitioners are in
possession and enjoyment of the property. The PTCL Act came
into force on 01.01.1979. The authority has initiated suo-motu
proceedings in the year 2006 under Sections 4 and 5 of the PTCL
Act. The Assistant Commissioner by order dated 07.12.2007 has
dismissed the application. Being aggrieved by the same, the
legal representatives of the original grantee have filed an appeal
before the Deputy Commissioner under Section 5A of the PTCL
Act. The Deputy Commissioner by order dated 10.10.2011
allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by the
5
Assistant Commissioner. Being aggrieved by the same, the
petitioners a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.