CRL.P.No.100286 /2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTMEBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.100286/2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. KARTIK VENKATESH,
AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: FILM DIRECTOR,
OFFICE AT:737/9, 60TH CROSS,
5TH BLOCK (OPP. VEIN CLINIC),
NEAR NAGRAJ, HERIGE HOSPITAL,
RAJAJI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560010.
…ACCUSED/PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADANGOUDA N. PATIL., ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH DHRWAD RURAL POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD-580011.
2.
MALLIKARJUN S/O. DEVENDRAPPA
ROTTIGAWAD, AGE: 51 YEARS,
OCC:FILM DIRECTOR, R/O. KANAVIHONNAPUR,
TALUK & DISTRICT: DHARWAD-580114.
…COMPLAINANTS/RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH., HCGP FOR R1)
(BY SRI. S. S. DODDALINGANNAVR., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
ANNAPURNA
CHINNAPPA
DANDAGAL
Digitally signed by
ANNAPURNA
CHINNAPPA
DANDAGAL
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH,
DHARWAD.
CRL.P.No.100286 /2022
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.482 OF
CR.P.C., TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THIS
PETITIONER IN CC NO.3759/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DHARWAD FOR
THE OFFENCE U/S.143, 500 AND 504 R/W. SECTION 149 OF
IPC VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ACCORDINGLY THE ORDER DATED
23.08.2021 PASSED IN PCR NO.3/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DHARWAD VIDE
ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON
09.09.2022, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Petitioner, who is arraigned as accused No.1, has
filed this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, with a
prayer to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C. No.
3759/2021 on the file of I-Additional Senior Civil Judge
and CJM, Dharwad, for the offences punishable under
Sections 143, 500, 504 r/w/s.149 of IPC, pursuant to
cognizance taken in PCR No.3/2020.
3
2.
It
is
the
case
of
the
petitioner
that
respondent No.2 filed a complaint stating that he is a
Director, Producer and Actor by Profession and owner of
MDR Film Institute. He is engaged in making of Kannada
Movie “Adivasi Raju” under the banner of MDR Film City.
He entered into an agreement with petitioner on
09.11.2019
for
providing
Camera
essentials
for
shooting, outdoor shooting unit and post including
censor approval. He has also entered into an agreement
with accused Nos.2 and 3 who agreed to work as
technical Director and Co-actor in the said Film.
2.1. Pursuant to the instigation by accused No.1,
accused No.2 to 5 formed whatsapp groups with the title
“Adivasi Raju”, without his consent added complainant
also to the said whatsapp group and started posting
about 250 defamatory voice messages against the
complainant
in
the
said
group.
Even
though,
complainant exited from the said whatsapp group,
accused persons again added him. When complainant
4
questioned it, they gave evasive reply and abused the
complainant.
2.2. The accused persons have created a new
whatsapp group and started posting false messages that
complainant is suffering from Corona, he cannot see and
hear properly, he is enjoying life at such a ripe age and
he appears to be a devil and thereby accused persons
have damaged the reputation of the complainant’s
institution in the eye of public. Due to the same, no
actors and technicians are coming forward to work
under
complainant’s
banner
and
causing
mental
harassment.
Though
complainant
approached
the
jurisdictional police in order to file complaint, they have
refused to receive the same and therefore he has filed
private complaint for the offences punishable under
section 143, 500 and 504 read with section 149 of IPC.
2.3. Without application of mind, the trial Court
has taken cognizance and issued summons against
5
accused Nos.1 to 5 including the petitioner. Challenging
the same this petition is filed.
3.
Respondent No.1 has appeared through High
Court Government Pleader.
4.
Respondent No.2 has also appeared through
counsel.
5.
During the course of arguments learned
counsel representing the petitioner submitted that to
extract money from the petitioner, respondent No.2 has
filed a false complaint. The matter between them is of
Civil nature and the provisions of Sections 143, 500, 504
read with section 149 of IPC are not attracted and prays
to allow the petition.
6.
On the other hand learned counsel for
respondent No.2 has submitted that respondent No.2
and petitioner entered into an agreement for supplying
of camera essentials and also to provide outdoor
6
shooting unit and post production including the censor
approval. Accused Nos.2 and 3 agreed to work as
Technical Director and Co-actor in the film. In this
regard petitioner has received Rs.4,50,000/- out of total
sum of Rs.6,50,000/-. However, after shooting for 15
days, when the complainant checked the footage, he
found that the footage is not of the good quality as the
camera supplied was not as per required quality. When
the complainant confronted accused No.1/petitioner, he
was annoyed and therefore on the instigation of
petitioner-accused No.1, the remaining accused i.e.
accused No.2 to 5 formed a whatsapp group by name
“Adivasi Raju” without his consent added complainant
also to the said whatsapp group and started posting
about 250 defamatory voice messages against the
complainant
in
the
said
group.
Even
though,
complainant exited from the said whatsapp group,
accused persons again added him. When complainant
questioned it, they gave evasive reply and abused the
7
complainant with the int