HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VINAYAKUMAR ALIAS VINAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
1. Charge sheet is filed against the accused alleging
that accused Nos. 1 and 2 without prior permission
from the competent authority was preparing to use
explosive which could endanger human life and it is also
alleged that the petitioner-accused No.3 had supplied
the said explosive to the accused Nos. 1 and 2. Learned
Sessions Judge accepted the charge sheet and took
cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 5
and 6 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 and Section
- 3 -
9B(1)(a)(b) of the Explosive Substance Act, 1964.
Taking exception to the same, the accused No.3 is
before this court.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that in the absence of any corroborative material the
filing of charge sheet against the petitioner, only on the
statement of the co-accused is impermissible. Hence,
he submits that the charge sheet filed against the
petitioner is untenable.
3. On the other hand, learned HCGP appearing for the
respondent-State
submits
that
petitioner
having
supplied explosive substance to the accused Nos.1 and
2 has committed aforesaid offences alleged against him
and the police have rightly filed the charge sheet
against the petitioner and the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.