- 1 -
CCC No. 100056 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100056 OF 2022 (-)
BETWEEN:
SHRI BALASAHEB S/O. BHARMAGOUDA PATIL
AGE. 86 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. H. NO.768/32, RPAD COLLEGE ROAD,
HINDAWADI, BELAGAVI-590011
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. K L PATIL.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI. RUDRESH S GHALI
COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
BELAGAVI, SUBHAS NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI.CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO,
SECURE THE PRESENCE OF ACCUSED PERSON, INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AND PUNISH THEM FOR HAVING COMMITTED
CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED 13.08.2021 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP.NO.102729/2021 PRODUCED AT
ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S.SUNIL DUTT
YADAV J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 2 -
CCC No. 100056 of 2022
The accused has filed a memo, which reads as under:
“1.
It is submitted that, the Complainant has filed
the present contempt petition for alleging non-compliance of
the directions issued by the Learned Single Judge of this
Hon’ble Court as per Order dated 13.08.2021 in WP
No.102729/2021 (LB-RES).
2.
It is submitted that, the Complainant had filed
WP No.102729/2021 contending that, the Complainant is
owner of CTS No.768/2021 situated at Patvardhan Layout,
Belagavi. It is part of CTS No.2791. On 05.05.2010, without
any
notice
and
without
following
any
procedure,
the
Respondent No.3 therein (i.e., City Corporatoin, Belagavi)
demolished the compound wall and forcibly took possession of
nearly 1.2 guntas of land.
3.
It is further submitted that, the Complainant had
filed above said writ petition seeking issuance of writ in the
nature of mandamus directing Respondent – City Corporation,
Belagavi to consider the Representations dated 27.10.2020
Annexure-B, dated 27.01.2021 vide Annexure-D and also
representation dated 17.02.2021 vide Annexure-E and also
sought direction to the Respondent to comply/implement
directions issued by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in
Writ Appeal No.6132/2011 vide its order dated 20.02.2013.
Upon hearing, the Learned Single Judge was pleased to direct
the Respondent-City Corporation, Belagavi to consider the
Representations dated 27.10.2020 vide Annexure-B, dated
27.01.2021 vide Annexure-D and also representation dated
17.02.2021 vide Annexure-E and consequently directed to
comply/implement directions issued by the Division Bench of
this Hon’ble Court in Writ Appeal No.6132/2011 vide order
dated 20.02.2013 and pass appropriate orders within a period
- 3 -
of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
4.
It is submitted that, during pendency of the
present petition, in order to show bonafideness, the Accused
has deposited a sum of Rs.47,49,500/- before this Hon’ble
Court on 22.08.2022 by way of Demand Draft dated
20.08.2022. This Hon’ble Court by order dated 22.08.2022
directed the registry to keep the said amount in fix deposit.
Thereafter, on 24.08.2022 Proposal/Request Letter has been
sent to the Deputy Commissioner, Belagavi, requesting to
acquire the land measuring 100.625 Sq.Meter out of property
bearing CTS No.2791/1 situated at RPD College Road,
Hindawadi, Belagavi belonging to the Complainant and
acquisition proceedings is under process.
5.
It is submitted that, in compliance with the
directions issued by this Hon’ble Court, the Accused has set
the acquisition proceeding in motion. It is further submitted
that, the acquisition proceedings involves State Government,
Revenue Department & other authorities. In co-operation with
the concerned authorities, it may take six months to complete
the acquisition proceedings including passing of award.
6.
Under the above facts, the Accused seek six
months time to comply with the directions issued this Hon’ble
Court by Order dated 13.08.2021 in WP No.102729/2021 (LB-
RES).
In view of the above said facts and circumstances, it is
most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be
pleased to drop the above contempt proceeding, in the interest
of justice.”
2.
It is stated that time is fixed to complete the
acquisition proceedings including passing of award.
- 4 -
3.
Taking note that an amount of Rs.47,49,500/- with
accrued interest has been deposited by way of demand draft
before this court, it would be appropriate to meet the ends of
justice to permit the complainant who is land looser to
withdraw the said amount by furnishing indemnity bond.
Indemnity bond is to be executed to ensure that if the amount
that is awarded is lesser than the amount that is deposited,
then interest of the accused authority would be taken note of.
4.
Accordingly,
the
complainant
is
permitted
to
withdraw the amount in deposit upon furnishing indemnity
bond.
5.
In the light of the undertaking given in para 5 and 6
of the memo, the contempt proceeding
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.