- 1 -
CRL.P No. 100700 of 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100700 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
FIROZ S/O ALLAUDDIN SANADI
AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
2.
SADASHIV S/O. MADHUKAR SINGHE
AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER,
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
3.
MAHADEV S/O. RAMU BAGEWADI
AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
4.
KIRAN S/O. MANOHAR JADAV
AGE. 39 YEARS,OCC.MECHANIC
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
5.
BHIMU S/O. MURAGEPPA BASTWADE
AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 100700 of 2022
2
6.
MANJU ALIAS MANJUNATH
S/O. PRABHAKAR TERDAL
AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS
R/O. UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S HOSMANI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY KAGWAD POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
2.
SMT. KAMALAVVA W/O. SHIVAMALAPPA BAGOJI
AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. CHIEF OFFICER,
UGAR K H MUNICIPALITY,
R/O. H.NO. 81,
MAHALINGESHWAR NAGAR, GOKAK,
NOW RESIDING AT
UGAR K H, TQ. KAGWAD
DIST. BELAGAVI- 591316
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDING IN CC NO.752/2021
(ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.54/2020 OF KAGWAD P.S.) AGAINST
THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 143,
147, 269, 270, 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 OF THE EPIDEMIC
- 3 -
CRL.P No. 100700 of 2022
3
DISEASES ACT, PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC COURT KAGWAD PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND B,
RESPECTIVELY, SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED.
The first information report was lodged against the
petitioners alleging that the petitioners and other accused
formed an unlawful assembly in violation to the order of
prohibition passed under Section 144 of Cr.P.C., and
protested for shifting of COVID-19 patients from Kudachi
town to Uragkhurd town. The police registered the first
information report against the petitioners and other accused
for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 269,
270 read with 149 of IPC and section 3 of the Epidemic
Diseases Act, 1897 and after investigation filed the charge
sheet against the petitioners and 13 others, however the
other accused were left out from the charge sheet, who are
the
officials
of
Ugarkhurd
Municipality.
The
learned
Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet, took cognizance
of the aforesaid offences against the petitioners. Taking
exception to the same, this petition is filed.
- 4 -
4
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there
are no materials produced along with the charge sheet to
substantiate the allegations that the petitioners were
infected with COVID-19 virus so as to attract the offences
punishable under sections 269 and 270 of IPC. He further
submits that the police having left out the other accused,
who are officials of the Municipality, the filing of charge sheet
against
the
present
petitioners,
is
arbitrary
and
discriminatory.
On the other hand, learned HCGP appearing for
the respondent-state submits that the petitioners and other
accused by forming an unlawful assembly, in violation of
prohibitory order passed under section 144 of Cr.P.C.,
prevented the shifting of COVID-19 patients from Kudachi
town to Ugarkhurd town and have committed offences
alleged against them in the charge sheet. Hence, he justifies
the taking of cognizance by the learned Magistrate for the
offences alleged in the charge sheet.
I have considered the submissions made by the
learned counsel for parties.
- 5 -
5
The charge sheet materials disclose that the
petitioners were neither tested COVID positive nor were they
carrying disease so as to attract offence punishable under
section 269 and 270 of IPC. Hence, the charge sheet filed
against the petitioners for the offences under section 269
and 270 of IPC is without any substance.
Initially,
the
first
information
report
was
registered against 28 persons, however, the police after
investigation left out the other accused, who are employees
of municipality. Though the allegation is that the petitioners
and other accused formed unlawful assembly, the police
having filed the charge sheet against the petitioners and
leaving other members of unlawful assembly is nothing but
arbitrary and discriminatory, and even otherwise, the charge
sheet material also does not disclose that the petitioners,
who are the immediate residents of the place of incident
have actively participated in the protest against the shifting
of COVID-19 patients by forming unlawful assembly. Hence,
the filing of the charge sheet against the petitioners is not
sustainable in law. Accordingly, I pass the following:
- 6 -
6
ORDER
The criminal petition is allowed.
The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.752/
2021 (arising out of Crime No.54/2020 of Kagwad
P.S.) against the petitioners for the offences
punishable under sections 143, 147, 269, 270 read
with section 149 of IPC and section 3 of the
Epidemic
Diseases
Act,
pending
before
the
Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Kagwad as
against the present petitioners i.e. accused No.2,
7, 10, 11, 16 and 17, is hereby stayed.
In view of disposal of the matter, pending
interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for
consideration and are dismissed accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
YAN
- 7 -
7
HCJ:
18.10.2022
ORDER
At page-6 of the operative portion of the order dated
16.3.2022, on account of typographical error, the word
`stayed’ has been typed instead of `quashed’.
Accordingly, it is directed that the word `stayed’ shown at
page-6 of the operative portion is ordered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.