HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
FIROZ S/O ALLAUDDIN SANADI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The first information report was lodged against the
petitioners alleging that the petitioners and other accused
formed an unlawful assembly in violation to the order of
prohibition passed under Section 144 of Cr.P.C., and
protested for shifting of COVID-19 patients from Kudachi
town to Uragkhurd town. The police registered the first
information report against the petitioners and other accused
for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 269,
270 read with 149 of IPC and section 3 of the Epidemic
Diseases Act, 1897 and after investigation filed the charge
sheet against the petitioners and 13 others, however the
other accused were left out from the charge sheet, who are
the
officials
of
Ugarkhurd
Municipality.
The
learned
Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet, took cognizance
of the aforesaid offences against the petitioners. Taking
exception to the same, this petition is filed.
- 4 -
4
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there
are no materials produced along with the charge sheet to
substantiate the allegations that the petitioners were
infected with COVID-19 virus so as to attract the offences
punishable under sections 269 and 270 of IPC. He further
submits
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.