SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
IRAPPA ALIAS IRAVVA S/O. SHIVAPPA NARIYAVAR – Appellant
Versus
RATNAVVA W/O. SHIVANGOUDA POLICEPATIL – Respondent


The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the

following relief:

TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING/SETTING

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RON, O.S.NO.76/2016 ON

I.A.NO.17 DATED 09.02.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND THE

SAID I.A.NO.17 MAY PLEASE BE ALLOWED.

- 4 -

O.S.No.76/2016 had been filed seeking for partition

and separate possession. The petitioners who are

defendant Nos.6 and 8 in the said suit had filed their

written statement in the year 2018. Thereafter issues

were framed, evidence was led by the plaintiff.

Subsequently,

other

defendants

also

led

their

evidence and the matter was posted for cross-

examination of DW.3 and at that stage an application

under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC came to be filed which

is numbered as I.A.No.17.

By way of said amendment application, defendant

Nos.6 and 8 have sought for amendment of nearly

six pages. In the affidavit in support thereof the

contention is that the amendments are required to

further and properly explain the pleadings earlier

taken

up

in

the

written

statement,

which

requirement having been pointed out by the new

counsel who had entered appearance for defendants.

The said applicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top