SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

DHARWAD BENCH

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

CONCILIATORS PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

AND

SHRI MRUTYUNJAY T.BANGI, MEMBER

CRL.R.P.No.100006/2015 (MV)

LOK ADALAT No.1089/2022

BETWEEN:

DYANADEV BALU BANE,

OCC: SERVICE,

R/O. HIDAKAL VIDYALAYA,

HIDAKAL,

TAL: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.

...PETITIONER

(BY SHRI. RAJENDRA R. PATIL., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SIDDAPPA LAGAMANNA GAYAGOL,

AGE: 51 YEARS,

OCC: SERVICE & AGRICULTURE,

R/O. MANJARI, TAL: CHIKODI,

DIST: BELGAUM.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SHRI.SANTOSH S. HATTIKATAGI., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397(1)

R/W. SECTION 401 OF CPC SEEKING TOSET ASIDE

2

THE

IMPUGNED

PASSED

BYTHE

VII-

ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT

SESSIONS

JUDGE,

BELGAUM, IN CRL.A.NO.205/2013 DATED 26.11.2014

MODIFYING

JUDGMENT

PASSED

BYTHE

II-

ADDITIONAL

CIVIL

JDUGE

JMFC

COURT,

CHIKODI, IN C.C.NO.651/2020 DATED 05.12.2013 BY

ALLOWING

THIS

REVISION

PETITION

CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED

AND ETC.,.

THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION

BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFFERED BY THE

COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS

PASSED:

CONCILIATION ORDER

The petitioner, respondent and the respective

counsels are present. The parties are identified by their

respective counsels.

2.

On conciliation the parties have settled the

matter. A joint memo is filed recording the terms of the

settlement. As per the terms of the settlement the

petitioner/accused has already deposited Rs.1,50,000/-

out of compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- awarded by the first

appellate court.

3.

The respondent/complainant has agreed to

receive the said compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/-

towards full and final settlement of the claim.

3

4.

Since

the

offence

under

the

Negotiable

Instruments Act is compoundable, permission accorded for

compounding in terms of the joint memo.

5.

The amount of Rs.1,50,000/- deposited before

the trail Court shall be paid to the complainant.

6.

In view of the compounding of the offence,

petition is allowed. The impugned order of conviction and

sentence are hereby set aside.

7.

The petitioner is acquitted of the offence

punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Bail bond of the

petitioner and his surety shall stand discharged. The fine

amount deposited by the petitioner shall be refunded to

him.

8.

The trail court records to be transmitted to the

trial court forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

MEMBER

PJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top