SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BENCH AT DHARWAD
DYANADEV BALU BANE, – Appellant
Versus
SIDDAPPA LAGAMANNA GAYAGOL, – Respondent


PASSED

BYTHE

VII-

ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT

SESSIONS

JUDGE,

BELGAUM, IN CRL.A.NO.205/2013 DATED 26.11.2014

MODIFYING

JUDGMENT

PASSED

BYTHE

II-

ADDITIONAL

CIVIL

JDUGE

JMFC

COURT,

CHIKODI, IN C.C.NO.651/2020 DATED 05.12.2013 BY

ALLOWING

THIS

REVISION

PETITION

CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED

AND ETC.,.

THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION

BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFFERED BY THE

COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS

PASSED:

CONCILIATION ORDER

The petitioner, respondent and the respective

counsels are present. The parties are identified by their

respective counsels.

2.

On conciliation the parties have settled the

matter. A joint memo is filed recording the terms of the

settlement. As per the terms of the settlement the

petitioner/accused has already deposited Rs.1,50,000/-

out of compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- awarded by the first

appellate court.

3.

The respondent/complainant has agreed to

receive the said compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/-

towards full and final settlement of the claim.

3

4.

Since

the

offence

under

the

Negotiable

Instruments Act is compoundable, permission accorded for

compounding in terms of the joint memo.

5.

The amount of Rs.1,50,000/- depos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top