HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
DHARWAD BENCH
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
CONCILIATORS PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
SHRI MRUTYUNJAY T.BANGI, MEMBER
CRL.R.P.No.100006/2015 (MV)
LOK ADALAT No.1089/2022
BETWEEN:
DYANADEV BALU BANE,
OCC: SERVICE,
R/O. HIDAKAL VIDYALAYA,
HIDAKAL,
TAL: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM.
...PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. RAJENDRA R. PATIL., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SIDDAPPA LAGAMANNA GAYAGOL,
AGE: 51 YEARS,
OCC: SERVICE & AGRICULTURE,
R/O. MANJARI, TAL: CHIKODI,
DIST: BELGAUM.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI.SANTOSH S. HATTIKATAGI., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397(1)
R/W. SECTION 401 OF CPC SEEKING TOSET ASIDE
2
THE
IMPUGNED
PASSED
BYTHE
VII-
ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BELGAUM, IN CRL.A.NO.205/2013 DATED 26.11.2014
MODIFYING
JUDGMENT
PASSED
BYTHE
II-
ADDITIONAL
CIVIL
JDUGE
JMFC
COURT,
CHIKODI, IN C.C.NO.651/2020 DATED 05.12.2013 BY
ALLOWING
THIS
REVISION
PETITION
CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED
AND ETC.,.
THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION
BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFFERED BY THE
COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS
PASSED:
CONCILIATION ORDER
The petitioner, respondent and the respective
counsels are present. The parties are identified by their
respective counsels.
2.
On conciliation the parties have settled the
matter. A joint memo is filed recording the terms of the
settlement. As per the terms of the settlement the
petitioner/accused has already deposited Rs.1,50,000/-
out of compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- awarded by the first
appellate court.
3.
The respondent/complainant has agreed to
receive the said compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/-
towards full and final settlement of the claim.
3
4.
Since
the
offence
under
the
Negotiable
Instruments Act is compoundable, permission accorded for
compounding in terms of the joint memo.
5.
The amount of Rs.1,50,000/- deposited before
the trail Court shall be paid to the complainant.
6.
In view of the compounding of the offence,
petition is allowed. The impugned order of conviction and
sentence are hereby set aside.
7.
The petitioner is acquitted of the offence
punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Bail bond of the
petitioner and his surety shall stand discharged. The fine
amount deposited by the petitioner shall be refunded to
him.
8.
The trail court records to be transmitted to the
trial court forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
MEMBER
PJ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.