HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHRI. PRABHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. PRASHANT – Respondent
MFA/100323/2020
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
MFA.NO.100323/2020 (CPC)
BETWEEN
1 .
SHRI. PRABHAKAR S/O. GANGADHAR VAJANTRI
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AUTO DRIVER,
R/O: CTS NO.4022/3,GANACHARI GALLI,
KAKATIVES, BELAGAVI-590001
2 .
SMT. GOURABAI @ ANNAPURNA
W/O. PRABHAKAR VAJANTRI
AGE: 57 YEARS,OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: CTS NO.4022/3,GANACHARI GALLI,
KAKATIVES, BELAGAVI-590001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SMT.SUNANDA P.PATIL, ADV.)
AND
1 . SHRI. PRASHANT
S/O PRABHAKAR VAJANTRI
AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: CTS NO.4026/1B,GANACHARI GALLI,
KAKATIVES, BELAGAVI-590001
2 . SMT. GAYATRI W/O. SHEETAL GADVI
AGE: 42 YEARS,OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: BHADAGAON-416502,
TALUKA: GADHINGLAJ,
DIST: KOLHAPUR,MAHARASTRA STATE
- 2 -
3 . SMT. RENUKA W/O. RAJKUMAR DODAMANI
AGE: 37 YEARS,OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: BHADAGAON-416502,
TALUKA: GADHINGLAJ,DIST: KOLHAPUR,
MAHARASTRA STATE
4 . SHRI SUDHIR S/O GAJANAN PATIL
AGE: 48 YEARS,OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: NARAYAN GALLI,KANGRALI-590010
TALUKA and DIST: BELAGAVI
5 . SHRI DEEPAK S/O GAJANAN PATIL
AGE: 44 YEARS,OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: NARAYAN GALLI, KANGRALI-590010
TALUKA and DIST: BELAGAVI
6 . SHRI. MALLAPPA S/O BHAVAKU PATIL
AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: NARAYAN GALLI,KANGRALI-590010
TALUKA and DIST: BELAGAVI
7 . SHRI SHANKARANAND
S/O KADAPPA JOGIN
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: SAMBHAJI GALLI,KHASBAG-590003
TALUKA and DIST: BELAGAVI
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.M.KULKARNI, ADV. FOR R1,
SRI.RAVI BALIKAI, ADV. FOR R4 TO 6,
NOTICE TO R3 & R7 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/O XLIII RULE 1(r) R/W SETION 104 OF
CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.11.2019 PASSED
BY THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, BELAGAVI IN
O.S.NO.333/2018 ON I.A.NO.I AND ALLOW THE APPEAL WIT COSTS
THROUGHOUT BY DISMISSING I.A.NO.I IN O.S.NO.333/2018 ON THE
FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, BELAGAVI.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
JUDGMENT
Appellant Nos.1 and 2 who are defendant Nos.1 and 2 in
O.S.No.333/2018 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil
Judge & JMFC, Belagavi approached this court being aggrieved
by the impugned order dated 05.11.2019 passed on I.A.No.I
filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 under Order XXXIX Rule 1
and 2 of CPC where under temporary injunction is granted
restraining the appellants from alienating/altering the suit
schedule properties till disposal of the suit.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that, respondent No.1
being plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession
of his share in the suit schedule property. During the pendency
of the suit, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.I under Order XXXIX Rule 1
and 2 of CPC praying for temporary injunction restraining the
defendants from alienating/altering the nature of the suit
schedule properties bearing CTS Nos.4022/3B, 4026/1B and
Sy.No.291 of Kakatives, Belagavi in favour of any third party, till
disposal of the suit. The said application was considered by the
trial court and vide order dated 05.11.2019, I.A.No.I was
- 4 -
allowed restraining the defendants by means of a temporary
injunction from alienating/altering the nature of the suit
schedule properties in favour of anybody, in any mode or
manner, till disposal of the suit.
3.
Being aggrieved by the said order passed by the trial
court, the appellants are before this court.
4.
Heard the learned counsel Smt.Sunanda P.Patil for
the appellants, learned counsel Sri.R.M.Kulkarni for respondent
No.1. and learned counsel Sri.Ravi Balikai for respondent Nos.4
to 6.
5.
The learned counsel for the appellants submitted
that, plaintiff filed I.A.No.I in O.S.No.333/2018 against the
appellants
and
other
defendants
restraining
them
from
alienating/altering the nature of the suit