- 1 -
CRL.P No. 100442 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT
CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100442 OF 2020 (482-)
BETWEEN:
1.
ALLAHBAX GULAB SHAIKH
AGE. 49 YEARS,
OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
2.
ROSHANBI GULAAB SHAIKH
AGE. 67 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
3.
SHABAANA ALLABAX SHAIKH
AGE. 39 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O UGAR KHUR,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
4.
SHAMSHODDIN GULAAB LAANDAGE
AGE. 36 YEARS,
V N
BADIGER
Digitally signed by V
N BADIGER
Location: DHARWAD
Date: 2022.04.24
13:05:32 +0530
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 100442 of 2020
OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
5.
MOHAMMAD GULAAB LAANDAGE
AGE. 35 YEARS,
OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
6.
BAANUMAA RAMAZAAN GODAD
AGE. 62 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
7.
YAASMEEN MOHAMMAD LAANDAGE
AGE. 39 YEARS,
OCC.HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
8.
RAMEJAA SHABBIR ALASE,
AGE. 35 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O SHIRGUPPI,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI M. B. GUNDAWADE
- 3 -
CRL.P No. 100442 of 2020
AND SRI A. M. GUNDAWADE, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, AT:DHARWAD,
THROUGH KAGWAD POLICE STATION.
2.
GAFOOR SHAHBUDDIN SANADI
AGE. 54 YEARS,
OCC. LABOUR CONTRACTOR,
R/O MARATHA GALLI,
UGAR KHURD,
TQ. ATHANI,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591316.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP FOR R1,
SRI NEELENDRA D. GUNDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 8, IN
C.C.NO.2425/2019 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, ATHANI, FOR THE ALLEGED
OFFENCES U/SEC.143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 307,
504, 506 R/W 149 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 4 -
CRL.P No. 100442 of 2020
The first information report was lodged by the second
respondent alleging that the petitioners/accused abused
him in filthy language and threatened him with dire
consequences,
and
also
assaulted
him.
The
police
registered the FIR against the petitioners for the offences
punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 504,
506 read with 149 of IPC in crime No.30/2013. The police
after investigation filed a charge sheet for the aforesaid
offences
alleged
to
have
been
committed
by
the
petitioners/accused.
The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the
aforesaid offences alleged against the petitioners.
Such being the case, the second respondent
filed a private complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C.
alleging that though the petitioners have committed an
offence punishable under Section 307, the police by
dropping the said offence have filed charge sheet for the
- 5 -
aforesaid offences. The learned Magistrate took cognizance
of the offences punishable under Section 307 of IPC and
other offences and thereafter referred the matter to the
police for investigation under Section 156(3) of IPC.
Taking exception to the same, this petition is filed.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
would make two fold statements:
Firstly, the police having filed the charge sheet
against the petitioners and the learned Magistrate having
taken cognizance of the offences alleged against the
petitioners, the filing of the private complaint under
Section 200 of Cr.P.C. on the very same incident is not
maintainable in law, since, it violates article 21 of the
constitution of India. In support, reliance is placed on the
decision of the co-ordinate bench of this Court in
Crl.P.No.3171/2018.
Secondly, he submits that the offences alleged
against the petitioners are triable by the learned Sessions
Judge, however, the learned Magistrate without having
- 6 -
any jurisdiction has referred the matter to the police for
investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. which is
impermissible.
The
learned
counsel
appearing
for
the
respondent No.2 submits that the learned Magistrate by
exercising the power under Section 210 of Cr.P.C. has
rightly referred the matter to the police for investigation
under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. He further submits that
the material produced before the learned Magistrate
clearly disclose that the commission of the offences
punishable under Section 307 of IPC. However, the police
have not filed charge sheet for the said offence though
sufficient material was valuable.
On
the
other
hand,
learned
High
Court
Government Pleader appearing for the State submits that
the police after considering the material on record have
rightly issued the endorsement that in view of the filing of
the charge sheet on the very same incident further
- 7 -
investigation
cannot
be
proceeded
against
the
petitioners/accused.
I have considered the submission made by the
learned counsel for the parties.
It is undisputed fact that the charge sheet filed
against the petitioners/accused in Crime No.30/2013 and
the private complaint filed by the second respondents are
arising out of the very same incident between the same
parties.
9.
It is also undisputed that, when the private
complaint was filed under Section 200 of Cr.P.C., the
police after investigation had filed charge sheet and the
learned Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet had
taken cognizance of the offences alleged against the
petitioners.
10.
Section 210 of Cr.P.C. specifies that the learned
Magistrate during the course of enquiry shall stay the
proceedings of such inquiry or trial, when it is brought to
- 8 -
the notice of the learned Magistrate and call for the report
of inquiry or trial from the police during the course of the
investigation in relation to the offence which is the subject
matter of the inquiry. In the present case when the private
complaint was filed by the second respondent, the police
had already investigated the matter and submitted the
charge sheet. Since, the investigati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.