- 1 -
CRL.P No.100974 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100974 OF 2023 (439-)
BETWEEN:
SRI SHIVANAND ALIAS SHIVAPPA
S/O HANAMANT BHAJANTRI
AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SIDDAPUR, TAL. JAMAKHANDI,
DIT. BAGALKOTE-587330.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRINAND A. PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. RAJENDRA R.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH JAMAKHANDI POLICE STATION,
NOW REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
AT DHARWAD-580011
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S.HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC.,
SEEKING TO GRANT BAIL THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN CRIME
NO. 63/2023 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 20A OF
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT,
1985, BY THE RESPONDENT JAMAKHANDI PS, PENDING ON
THE FILE OF COURT OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,
BAGALKOTE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
SAMREEN AYUB
DESHNUR
High Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad
- 2 -
CRL.P No.100974 of 2023
Heard on bail application.
2.
On the basis of a complaint filed by one
G.G.Biradar, P.S.I. (Law & Order), Jamkhandi Rural Police
Station, the Jamkhandi Rural Police Station has registered
a
case
against
accused-petitioner
herein
in
Crime
No.63/2023 for the commission of the offence punishable
under
Section
20(A)
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3.
It is the case of the prosecution that the first
informant got credible information that the accused had
grown ganja in the land bearing Sy.No.162/6 measuring 1
acre 15 guntas. In view of the same, the first informant
and the staff rushed to the spot and found that the
accused had grown ganja in his land. The first informant
conducted panchanama and seized 76 kgs. 800 grams of
ganja plants and thus, the accused has committed the
offence alleged.
- 3 -
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
has submitted his arguments, that the petitioner has not
committed any offence as alleged against him. He submits
that, as per the case of the prosecution, the Investigating
Officer has seized the entire alleged ganja plant, weighed
the same to show as weighing 76 kgs. 800 gms. The
Investigating Officer has not separated the flowering or
fruiting tops of cannabis plant and as such, the same
cannot be called as ganja. The seized plant includes
stems, leaves, branches, fruiting parts and even soil and
under the circumstances, the stem, leaves, branches
cannot be termed as ganja. Further, it is submitted that,
as per the case of the prosecution itself, the alleged ganja
plants were grown in between the sugarcane crop and as
such, there are chances of said ganja having grown by
itself automatically and the petitioner is not at all aware of
the growth of the said plants. The petitioner is arrested on
17.04.2023 and is in judicial custody since the date of his
arrest. The investigation is already completed and the
petitioner is not required for investigation. It is further
- 4 -
submitted that the petitioner is an poor agriculturist; he is
not aware of the growth of the ganja plants in the land; he
is the only earning member of the family consisting of his
wife, three children, and father aged about 72 years and
mother aged about 68 years, who are suffering from age
old ailments. The petitioner has no antecedents of having
been convicted for any of the offences. To substantiate his
contention, learned counsel had relied on the orders of this
Court
passed
in
Criminal
Petition
No.101982/2022,
disposed of on 18.08.2022 (Sri. Dongrisab Vs. The State
of Karnataka) and Criminal Petition No.200085/2019,
disposed of on 05.02.2019 (Pundalik Vs. The State
through Indi Rural Police Station). On all these grounds,
sought for allowing the bail application.
5.
On perusal of the prosecution papers, it is
crystal clear that the ganja plants alleged to have been
seized by the Investigating Officer includes stem, flower
and leaves. The age of the ganja plants is also not
disclosed by the Investigating Officer at this stage.
- 5 -
6.
In the case of Srinivasalu Vs. State of
Karnataka reported in 2019 SCC Online Kar 2711, this
Court has held as under:
“11. As stated supra, the complainant Excise
Officer has seized 535 Ganja plants weighing 900
Kgs. It is specifically stated that the Ganja plants
were removed with roots and the entire Ganja
plants were weighed and found to be 900 Kgs.
Even when the sample was taken and sent to FSL
for examination the Ganja plants including leaves,
seeds, flower buds were sent. In the case of
K.K.Rejji stated supra this Court has observed in
para No.10 of the order as follows:
“10.
In the first instance, we have to go
on
the
premise
that
prosecution
charge
against
the
accused
is
based
on
alleged
seizure of Ganja. Ganja is defined under the
provision of NDPS Act as follows.-
2(iii)(b) Ganja, that is, the flowering or
fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding
the seeds and leaves when not accompanied
by the tops), by whatever name they