BENCH AT DHARWAD
STATE OF KARNATAKA, – Appellant
Versus
DARSHAN – Respondent
Appellant/State feeling aggrieved by the judgment of
acquittal passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karwar, in
C.C.No.567/2013 dated 27.04.2016, preferred this appeal.
Parties to the appeal are referred with their ranks as
assigned in the trial Court for the sake of convenience.
The
factual
matrix
leading
to
the
case
of
prosecution can be stated in nutshell to the effect that accused
No.3 obtained contract from the City Municipal Corporation for
maintaining swimming pool at Karwar. Accused Nos.1 and 2
are the trainers appointed by accused No.3 for giving coaching
to the public in swimming pool. On 10.04.2011 at 6.15 p.m.,
- 3 -
one Laxmidas Premanand Narvekar, son of complainant was
undergoing training with accused Nos.1 and 2 in the said
swimming pool. Accused Nos.1 and 2 did not provide any
safety equipments or made any safety arrangement, due to
which said Laxmidas Premanand Narvekar was drowned and
died in the said swimming pool. Due to negligence of accused
Nos.1 to 3 in maintaining swimming pool and by not taking
safety measures, son of complainant Laxmidas Premanand
Narvekar died due to drowning in the swimming pool.
4.
Accused Nos.1 to 3 were secured before the tr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.