BENCH AT DHARWAD
RAJESAB S/O SHAREEFSAB BELLATTI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Heard Sri M. M. Patil, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Smt.Girija S.Hiremath, learned High
Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1-
State. 2nd respondent/defacto complainant though
served with the notice remained absent.
2.
This petition is filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C., with the following:
“WHEREFORE, it is humbly and respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the
petition and enlarge the petitioner/accused No.2 on
bail in SPL.S.C. No.25/2023, in pursuance of the
crime No.02/2023 registered before the Haveri
Women’s Police Station, Haveri for the offences
punishable U/Sec.354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506, 34
of IPC and U/Sec. 8, 12, 18 of POCOS Act, 2012 and
67B (a)(b) of Information Technology Act, 2008 in
the interest of justice and equity.”
3.
The brief facts of the case are as under:-
Women
Police
Station,
Haveri
received
a
complaint from second respondent and based on the
said complaint registered a case in Crime No.2/2023
on 01.02.2023 for the offences punishable under
Sections 323, 354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506 read
with Section 34 of IPC, Sections 8, 12, 17 of POCSO
- 3 -
Act, 2012 and Section 67B (a)(b) of Information
Technology Act,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.