- 1 -
CRL.P No. 101207 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101207 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
RAJESAB S/O. SHAREEFSABBELLATTI,
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
R/O: HAKLAGI, TQ AND DIST: HAVERI,
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY HAVERI WOMENS POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP
HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD BENCH,
DHARWAD -580011.
2.
CHANNAYYA S/O. RUDRAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: FARMER,
R/O: MAROL -581110.
TQ AND DIST: HAVERI.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 439 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN
SPL. SC.NO. 25/2023, IN PURSUANCE OF THE CRIME NO. 02/2023
REGISTERED BEFORE THE HAVERI WOMENS POLICE STATION,
HAVERI FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. SEC. 354(A), 354(D), 341, 109,
506, 34 OF IPC AND U/SEC. 8, 12, 18 OF POSCO ACT 2012, AND 67B
(a(b) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2008.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
Date: 2023.06.21
12:21:15 -0700
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 101207 of 2023
Heard Sri M. M. Patil, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Smt.Girija S.Hiremath, learned High
Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1-
State. 2nd respondent/defacto complainant though
served with the notice remained absent.
2.
This petition is filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C., with the following:
“WHEREFORE, it is humbly and respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the
petition and enlarge the petitioner/accused No.2 on
bail in SPL.S.C. No.25/2023, in pursuance of the
crime No.02/2023 registered before the Haveri
Women’s Police Station, Haveri for the offences
punishable U/Sec.354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506, 34
of IPC and U/Sec. 8, 12, 18 of POCOS Act, 2012 and
67B (a)(b) of Information Technology Act, 2008 in
the interest of justice and equity.”
3.
The brief facts of the case are as under:-
Women
Police
Station,
Haveri
received
a
complaint from second respondent and based on the
said complaint registered a case in Crime No.2/2023
on 01.02.2023 for the offences punishable under
Sections 323, 354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506 read
with Section 34 of IPC, Sections 8, 12, 17 of POCSO
- 3 -
Act, 2012 and Section 67B (a)(b) of Information
Technology Act, 2008.
4.
Gist of the complaint averments reveal
that minor daughter of the complainant pursuing her
10th standard in the government school, returned
from the school on 31.01.2023 and she was in a
morose feeling and she was enquired by her mother.
At that juncture she shoot into emotion and revealed
that the petitioner/accused No.1 is troubling her in
the guise of a love affair. She also revealed that
petitioner along with his friends who are two more
accused persons, started pestering her to have a
love affair with the petitioner/accused No.1 and in
that regard, they gave life threat including putting
her in the fear of throwing acid on her and over
powered
her
and
made
her
nude
and
took
photographs.
They
started
demanding
further
sexual favors and when the victim girl refused, they
started blackmailing her stating that the
nude
photos would made viral in the social media. At that
- 4 -
juncture a friend of the victim girl came there and
with her help, she escaped from the clutches of the
accused persons. On enquiry by the friend, she has
revealed the incident to her friend and also told her
mother
that
the
petitioner
has
uploaded
nude
photographs of the victim girl on his whats-app
status in his mobile. Based on such complaint,
police
registered
a
case
as
aforesaid
and
investigated the matter in detail and filed the charge
sheet against the petitioner.
5.
The attempt made by the petitioner to
obtain an order of grant of bail is turned down by
the learned Special Judge in Spl.S.C.No.25/2023 by
order dated 26.04.2023. Thereafter, the petitioner is
before this Court.
6.
Sri.M.M.Patil,
learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner reiterating the grounds urged in the
petition contended that the petitioner is innocent of
the offence alleged against him and he has been
falsely implicated in the case and since the charge
- 5 -
sheet is filed and taking note of the fact that the
offence alleged against the petitioner is only under
Sections 8, 12 and 17 of POCSO Act, continuation of
the petitioner - accused in judicial custody is no
longer
warranted
and
sought
for
allowing
the
petition.
7.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader
reiterating
the
grounds
urged
in
the
objection statement contended that the offence
alleged against the petitioner is heinous in nature
and inasmuch as a 34 year old person was trying to
have physical relationship with a tenth standard
student would itself shows that there could not have
been any love affair between them and it is only lust
of the petitioner resulting in advancing the sexual
intentions
of
the
petitioner
and
therefore,
the
petitioner cannot be shown any mercy and grant of
bail in unwarranted.
8.
She also argued that the fact of petitioner
uploading the nude photo of the victim girl to his
- 6 -
statu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.