SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BENCH AT DHARWAD
RAJESAB S/O SHAREEFSAB BELLATTI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Heard Sri M. M. Patil, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Smt.Girija S.Hiremath, learned High

Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1-

State. 2nd respondent/defacto complainant though

served with the notice remained absent.

2.

This petition is filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C., with the following:

“WHEREFORE, it is humbly and respectfully

prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the

petition and enlarge the petitioner/accused No.2 on

bail in SPL.S.C. No.25/2023, in pursuance of the

crime No.02/2023 registered before the Haveri

Women’s Police Station, Haveri for the offences

punishable U/Sec.354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506, 34

of IPC and U/Sec. 8, 12, 18 of POCOS Act, 2012 and

67B (a)(b) of Information Technology Act, 2008 in

the interest of justice and equity.”

3.

The brief facts of the case are as under:-

Women

Police

Station,

Haveri

received

a

complaint from second respondent and based on the

said complaint registered a case in Crime No.2/2023

on 01.02.2023 for the offences punishable under

Sections 323, 354(A), 354(D), 341, 109, 506 read

with Section 34 of IPC, Sections 8, 12, 17 of POCSO

- 3 -

Act, 2012 and Section 67B (a)(b) of Information

Technology Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top