- 1 -
RPFC No.100099 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100099 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.USHA
W/O SHANTAVEERAYYA HIREMATH
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
# 81, JADARA GALLI,
R/O MARADAGI-580112,
TQ: AND DIST.DHARWAD.
2. SHIVACHETAN
S/O SHANTAVEERAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
# 81, JADARA GALLI,
R/O MARADAGI-580112,
TAL. AND DIST.DHARWAD.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI PADMAJA S. TADAPATRI, ADV.)
AND:
SHANTAVEERAYYA
S/O SHAMBAYYA HIREMATH,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O RAMAPUR-581207.
TQ. AND DIST.DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI B.V.KERUR, ADV.)
Digitally signed
by YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad
- 2 -
RPFC No.100099 of 2022
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE
FAMILY COURT ACT PRAYING THIS COURT TO ALLOW
THIS REVISION PETITION BY MODIFYING THE ORDER
DATED 14.10.2019 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
DHARWAD
IN
CRIMINAL
MISCD.NO.6/2008
AND
GRANT
AN
AMO9UNT
OF
MAINTENANCE TO THIS PETITIONER NO.1 WIFE AND
ALSO ENHANCE THE MAINTENANCE AMOUNT TO THE
PETITIONER NO.2 AS HE IS A STUDENT, IN THE ENDS OF
JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
1.
The present petition is filed by the wife and son
being aggrieved by the order dated 14.10.2019 passed in
Crl.Misc.No.6/2018 on the file of Principal Judge, Family
Court, Dharwad, in and by which, the Family Court
Dharwad while rejecting the claim for maintenance to
petitioner
No.1
has
however
awarded
a
monthly
maintenance of Rs.4,000/- payable to petitioner No.2.
2.
It is the case of the petitioners herein that the
marriage of petitioner No.1 with the respondent was
solemnized in the year 2001 at Ramapur village of
Dharwad Taluk as per Hindu Customs and Rituals. After the
- 3 -
marriage, she joined the respondent to lead a happily
married life. Initial few years she was treated well by the
respondent and his family members. Petitioner No.2 was
born in the year 2003. Respondent was doing agricultural
work. However, after the birth of petitioner No.2 started to
neglect the petitioners. That the respondent was picking up
quarrel with the petitioner No.1 and even use to physically
assault her. He used to keep the petitioners in the Farm
house without providing them food for days. He also did
not look after the educational expenses of petitioner No.2.
As petitioner No.1 had no independent source of income to
meet her expenses and the education expenses of
petitioner No.2, she filed petition seeking maintenance in a
sum of Rs.20,000/- per month.
3.
It is contended that the respondent owns an
extent of 15 acres of irrigated land at Ramapur village and
is growing sugarcane and earning a sum of Rs.6,00,000/-
and despite being capable of providing maintenance, has
refused and neglected to provide maintenance. The father
- 4 -
of petitioner No.1 is a paralytic patient and he too has no
independent source of income and she is in acute financial
constrains. On these grounds a petition is filed under
Section 125 of Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance.
4.
The respondent filed statement of objections
denying the allegations made by the petitioner. However,
admitted the marital status and the paternity of petitioner
No.2. He denies that he carrying on the agricultural
activities, on the other hand he is doing Vaiddika
profession as Swamiji. He also denied that he is neglecting
to provide any maintenance to the petitioners. It is his
specific defence that petitioner No.1 is an adamant lady
and was ill-treating him at the instigation of her parents
and sister who is living in Dharwad. That during his
marriage with petitioner No.1 has given 10 grams of gold
necklace, 5 grams of gold earrings, 20 grams of gold
mangalasutra, 30 grams of gold bangles and other silver
articles valuable worth Rs.10,000/- and he has not taken
any dowry from her. That the petitioner No.1 was
- 5 -
frequently visiting her parents house that she left the
matrimonial home without consent of the respondent and
his
family
members
and
he
has
spent
close
to
Rs.2,00,000/-
towards
the
educational
expenses
of
petitioner No.2. At the time of leaving the matrimonial
home, the petitioner has taken all the gold ornaments. He
contends that she is earning Rs.15,000/- per month
working in a medical shop. That the petitioner was insisting
to make a separate residence which he could not afford,
therefore the present petition only to harass him.
5.
Based on the aforesaid averments and counter
averments, the Family Court framed the following points
for its consideration;
1.
Whether the petitioners prove the alleged
willful
neglect
and
refusal
by
the
respondent in maintaining them inspite of
having sufficient means?
2.
If so, whether the petitioners are entitled
to seek maintenance as prayed for?
3.
Whether the respondent proves that the
petitioner No.1 herself being a wrong-doer,
having left him without any reasonable
- 6 -
cause,
she
is
not
entitled
to
seek
maintenance?
4.
What order?
6.
Petitioner examined herself as PW.1 and 3
other witnesses have been examined as PWs.2 to 4 and
exhibited 13 documents marked as Exs.P.1 to 13.
Respondent examined himself as RW.1 and other 2
w