HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHEQ AHAMMAD SIDDIKHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/100991/2018
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
CRIMINAL PEITTION NO.100991/2018
BETWEEN
SHEQ AHAMMAD SIDDIKHI,
AGE: 40 YEARS,
R/O: HOUSE NO.450,
OPP. KULLAYAPPA BUILDING,
R.S. ROAD, PATEL NAGARA,
HOSAPETE, BALLARI.
.....PETITIONER
(BY SRI J S SHETTY, ADV.)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR,
HOSAPETE TOWN POLICE STATION AUTHORITIES,
DIST: BALLARI,
REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD.
2.
SMT.K. SUDHABHAYI
W/O. L. VENKATESH,
AGE: 27 YEARS,
R/O: POLICE QUARTERS,
F BLOCK, HOUSE NO.2,
- 2 -
4TH WARD, HOSAPETE,
BALLARI DISTRICT.
…..RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP FOR R-1
SRI ANWAR BASHA, ADV. FOR R-2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASHING OF THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C.NO.153/2017
(HOSAPETE
TOWN
POLICE
STATION
CRIME
NO.211/2016), ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
HOSAPETE, FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONER ON THE COMPLAINT
MADE BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTION 338 OF THE IPC, BY ALLOWING THIS CRIMINAL
PETITION WITH COST THROUGHOUT IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, ON THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Even though the matter is listed for admission, with the
consent of learned counsel for parties, it is taken up for final
disposal.
2.
The petitioner/accused is before this Court seeking
to quash the entire proceedings initiated against him in Crime
No.211/2016 registered by Hosapete Town Police which is now
pending in C.C.No.153/2017 on the file of the learned Principal
Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Hospete (for short, ‘Trial Court’) for the
offence punishable under Section 338 of IPC.
- 3 -
3.
For the sake of convenience, the parties in this
petition are referred to as per their status and ranking before the
Trial Court.
4.
Brief
facts
of
the
case
are
that
the
informant/respondent No.2 Smt. K Sudhabhayi lodged the first
information with Hospete Town Police against the accused
stating that she was suffering from tooth ache and visited the
clinic of the accused who is a dentist. On 19.03.2016, she took
treatment with the accused. On 06.05.2016 accused suggested
for root canal procedure to molar teeth. But while conducting
root canal procedure, the accused was so negligent and the
instrument used in the procedure was broken and a piece was
remained inside the tooth. The accused under the guise of
removing the broken instrument had again treated the informant
but he could not remove it and left it there, which has resulted in
deep drilling in the tooth and unbearable pain to the informant.
She could not take any food for several days and she was on
liquid diet.
- 4 -
5.
The informant stated that she is working as a
Woman Police Constable and due to the pain in her teeth, she
could not attend to her duties. Even when she requested the
accused to do something to remove the instrument which
remained inside, he pleaded his inability and has not done
anything in that regard. Therefore, the informant visited Sri
Dharmasthala Manjunatheshawara Medical College Hospital,
Dharwad (for short, ‘SDMC’) and took treatment. They noticed
two pieces of the broken instrument deep inside the tooth and
treated her after removing the same. She was charged
Rs.25,000/-. When the accused was requested to make good
the loss which caused due to his negligence, he was not ready
and willing to heed. It is stated that the accused due to his
negligent act, left the instrument broken inside the teeth by
drilling teeth deep inside causing pain and inconvenience to the
informant which has also resulted in financial loss to her.
Therefore, she requested the police to register the case and
initiate criminal proceedings against the