Heard the appellant counsel and also the counsel

appearing for the respondent.

The factual matrix of the case of the claimant

before the tribunal is that, the minor claimant who

sustained injuries is aged about 11 years and suffered the

compound fracture of lower 1/3^rd of tibia and fibula and in

support of the claim examined the Doctor and Doctor

assessed the disability of 16% to whole body and also in

the evidence observed that, she walks with limping. The

tribunal accepted the disability of 6 to 10% and awarded

compensation of Rs.20,000/- under the head of pain and

- 3 -

suffering, medical expenses and attendant charges of

Rs.30,000/-, towards permanent disability, amenities and

marriage prospectus awarded an amount of Rs.60,000/-,

in all Rs.1,10,000/-. The counsel appearing for the

appellant would submits that, the tribunal failed to award

any compensation under the head of disability and also not

awarded any compensation under the head of loss of

income of parents since the parents have taken care of

minor girl, hence, the compensation is very meager and it

requires interference.

3.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent would vehemently contend that, the trib