SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
UMESH S/O. VITTAL PATIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA, – Respondent


Convicted

accused

in

Special

C.C.No.186/2009

by

judgment dated 11.07.2022 on the file of Special Judge,

Belagavi has preferred this appeal.

2.

Brief facts of the case are as under:

Upon the complaint lodged by one Sharifsab Pakrusab

Nadaf, Lokayukta police registered a case in Crime No.16/2008

for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read

with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Gist of the complaint averment reveals that, accused was

working as a Junior Training Officer in the Government ITI

College, Saundatti. Sister’s son of the complainant by name

Maktumsab was studying in second year ITI in Government ITI

College, Saundatti and final examination was scheduled to

commence in 21.07.2008. Sri Maktumsab had paid necessary

fee to be paid to the Government for attending the examination

and accused received Rs.5,500/- from each of the student in

the said class in order to see that the student would pass

through the examination effortlessly. Accordingly, accused also

demanded Rs.5,000/- from Maktumsab, which was not

- 3 -

interested to be paid by the complainant however he paid only

Rs.1,000/- and sought time for remitting the balance amount

and t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top