HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI.SHIVALINGAPPA S/O. SHANKARAPPA TANDUR – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, – Respondent
WP/62910/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.62910 OF 2011 (LB-UC)
BETWEEN:
SRI.SHIVALINGAPPA
S/O. SHANKARAPPA TANDUR
SINCE DECEASED R/BY HIS LRS.
1A.
SMT. ANNAPURNAMMA
W/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR,
AGE:78 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI,
TALUKA AND DIST:HAVERI
1B.
SMT. SHAKUNTALA
W/O NAGARAJ UDASI
AGE:63 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O WAGISH NAGAR, 7TH CROSS
RANEBENNUR, TALUKA: RANEBENNUR
DIST:HAVERI
1C.
SMT. SULOCHANA
D/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR
AGE:59 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI
TALUKA AND DIST:HAVERI
1D.
NAGARAJ
S/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR
AGE:42 YRS, OCC:AGRICULTURE
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI
TALUKA AND DIST:HAVERI
2
1E.
SMT. MAMTA
W/O RAJENDRA PATTANASHETTI
AGE:40 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
AND AGRICULTURE, R/O SUBHASA ROAD,
SANKESHWAR, TALUKA:SANKESHWAR,
DIST:BELGAUM
1F.
SHANKRAPPA
S/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR
AGE:57 YRS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI,
TALUKA AND DIST: HAVERI
1G. SMT.D.K.INDIRA
W/O KUMAR
AGE:42 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O SHIKARIPUR, TALUK: SHIKARIPUR
DIST:SHIVAMOGA
1H.
BASAVARAJ
S/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR
AGE:55 YRS, OCC:AGRICULTURE
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI
TALUKA AND DIST:HAVERI
1I.
VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O SHIVALINGAPPA TANDUR
AGE:52 YRS, OCC:AGRICULTURE
R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI
TALUKA AND DIST:HAVERI
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A. A. PATHAN AND AMIRKHAN A. PATHAN, ADVS. –
ABSENT)
AND
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER,
CITY MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, HAVERI.
3
3.
THE COMMISSIONER,
HAVERI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HAVERI.
4.
RAJASHEKAR
S/O. VEERUPAXAPPA KARI,
AGE: 45 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: ANGADI ROAD, HAVERI.
5.
SMT. SHAILA
W/O. RAJASHEKAR KARI,
AGE: 40 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: OPPOSITE MUNICIPAL HIGH SCHOOL
GROUND, HAVERI.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. S. KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1
SRI. PRAKASH ANDANIMATH, ADV. FOR R4 AND R5
SRI. PRASHANT V. MOGALI, ADV. FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
RESPONDENT Nos.1 AND 2 TO IMPLEMENT AND TAKE FURTHER
ACTION
AS
PER
THE
PROVISIONS
OF
KARNATAKA
MUNICIPALITIES ACT, PURSUANCE TO ANNEXURE-P DATED
19.08.2009 AGAINST RESPONDENT Nos.4 AND 5; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition was listed on 13.01.2021. On that day
case was called twice. There was no representation on
behalf of the petitioners. Hence the matter was adjourned
to this day ie., 20.01.2021, finally. In the order sheet it
4
was made clear that if the petitioners fail to appear on the
next date of hearing, the petition shall stand dismissed.
2. Today, the case is called thrice. There is no
representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the
writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RD