HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent
WP/82639/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION No.82639 OF 2013 (LA-RES)
BETWEEN
1 . KALLAPPA S/O BHAIMAPPA JIRALI,
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
2 . KANDUBA , S/O MARUTI CHAVAN,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
3 . NAMDEV, S/O KHANDUBA CHAVAN,
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
4 . DEEPAK, S/O NAMDEV CHAVAN,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
5 . KASHINATH, S/O PANDU SHINDHE
AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,.
6 . TUKARAM , S/O GUNDU JADAHV
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
7 . SAKHARAM, S/O GUNDU JADHAV
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
8 . KRISHNAJI, S/O GUNDU JADHAV
AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
2
9 . SHANKAR, S/O GOVIND JADHAV
AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
ALL ARE R/O: KANNOLLI,
TQ: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.N L BATAKURKI, ADV.)
AND
1 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
HIPPARAGI PROJECT, ATHANI,
TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELGAUM.
2 . THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION R and R)
MAJOR IRRIGATION SCHEMES,
BELGAUM TQ and DIST: BELGAUM.
3 . SECRETARY (MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT)
GOVERNEMT OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANSOUDH, BANGALORE.
4 . REVENUE SECRETARY
GOVERNEMT OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANSOUDH, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION
ISSUED BY RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 4(1) OF LA ACT DATED
10.05.2010 AND NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 6(1) OF LA ACT
AND GRANT INTERIM ORDER STAYING ALL FURHTER PROCEEDINGS
AND ACTION PURSUANT TO THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION ISSUED
BY RESPONDENT No.1 UNDERR SECTION 4(1) OF LA ACT DATED
10.05.2010 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION
6(1) OF LA ACT DATED 08.09.2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINAY HEAING-B
GROUP , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that writ
petition has become infructuous since respondents have
already constructed a canal.
2.
The said submission is placed on record.
3.
In view of construction of canal, writ petition is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HMB
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.