Sri.Sathish.M.S., learned counsel for the petitioner and

Smt.Padmaja S.Tadapatri., learned counsel for the respondent

have appeared in person.

2.

The parties shall be referred to as per their status

and ranking before the Trial Court.

3.

The Brief facts of the case are stated as under:

It is the case of the petitioner that, the petition schedule

premises belongs to her and she is the owner and landlord and

paying tax on it. That one Bharmappa the father of the

respondent has taken petition schedule premises on a rent basis

from the husband of the petitioner namely, Dharmasa R.Bharade

3

on a monthly rent of Rs.10/- per month on executing an

Agreement of Rent on 17.01.1972. It is stated that after the

death of his father, the respondent herein began to continue as a

tenant under Dharmasa R.Bharade on the same terms &

conditions as agreed by his father and began to pay a monthly

rent of Rs.10/- to Dharmasa R.Bharade.

It is said that the Dharmasa R.Bharade died during the

pendency of tenancy on 15-12-2004 leaving behind the

petitioner and his two sons as his legal heirs. The petitioner has

become the absolute owner of the scheduled mentioned

premises; the khatha has been changed in h