HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHA D/O SHANKRAPPA MATGODLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/102128/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRL.P.NO.101601/2021 C/W. CRL.P.102128/2019
CRL.P.NO.101601/2021
BETWEEN:
1 .
MALATESH S/O. SHANKRAPPA MATGODLI
AGE 41 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE
R/O. SUNAGAR CHAWL, OLD P B ROAD
DISTRICT DHARWAD-580001.
2 .
UMA ALIAS INDUMATHI
W/O. SHANKARAPPA MATGODLI
AGE : 77 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD
R/O. SUNAGAR CHAWL
OLD P B ROAD, DHARWAD
DIST DHARWAD-580001.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.: DAYANAND M. BANDI, ADV.)
AND:
1 .
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH DHARWAD SUB URBAN
POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY
HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
2 .
RASHMI W/O MALTESH METAGODLI
W/O. MALTESH METAGODLI
AGE 36 YEARS, OCC : NIL,
R/O: PURAD ONI, HAVERI,
DISTRICT : HAVERI-581201
2
(ADDRESS IS WRONGLY MENTIONED
IN COMPLAINT AND FIR IS
R/O. OLD P B ROAD, SUNAGAR CHAWAL
DHARWAD).
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAY M. MALALI, ADV. FOR R2,
SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING
TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
IN
S.C.NO.102/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL. DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD AND CONSEQUENTLY TO
QUASH THE FIR IN SUB-URBAN P.S. CRIME NO.04/2018
(C.C.NO.624/2018) U/S 498A, 307, 323, 504, 506, 109 R/W
SECTION 34 OF IPC, AS AGIANST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
NO.1 AND 2.
CRL.P.102128/2019
BETWEEN:
1 .
ASHA D/O SHANKRAPPA MATGODLI
AGE: 47 YEARS,OCC: BANK EMPLOYEE,
R/O: SHIVABASAV NAGAR,
HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI-581201.
2 .
KAVITA
W/O SANGAMESH PATTANASHETTY
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: LOKAPPANA HAKKALA,
VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580021.
3 .
SAVITA W/O ANIL KAMBAR
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: ACCOUNT ANALYST,
R/O: NO: 133, M.S. BUILDING,
BEHIND MARUTI MANDIR,
19TH CROSS, 21ST MAIN,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-NORTH-560040.
..PETITIONERS
3
(BY SRI.: K L PATIL AND SRI. DAYANAND M. BANDI, ADVS.)
AND:
1 .
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH DHARWAD SUB-URBAN
POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY
HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER.
2 .
RASHMI W/O MALTESH METAGODLI
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O: PURAD ONI, HAVERI,
DIST: HAVERI-581201.
(ADDRESS IS WRONGLY MENTIONED
IN COMPLAINT AND FIR IS
R/O. OLD P B ROAD, SUNAGAR CHAWAL
DHARWAD).
…..RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1
R2- SERVED.)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS/ORDER OF TAKING
COGNIZANCE U/S 498-A, 307, 323, 504, 506, 109 R/W SEC. 34
OF IPC AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 TO 5 IN
SUB-URBAN P.S. CRIME NO.04/2018 (C.C.NO.624/2018) BY THE
COURT OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, DHARWAD, WHICH
IS COMMITTED LATER AND CONVERTED TO S.C.NO.102/2018
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV-ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS
JUDGE, DHARWAD.
THESE
CRIMINAL
PETITIONS
ARE
COMING
ON
FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
Crl.P.No.101601/2021 is filed by accused Nos.1
and 2 and Crl.P.No.102128/2019 is filed by accused
Nos.3 to 5 seeking quashing of the entire proceedings in
S.C. No.102/2018 pending on the file of IV Additional
District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad registered for
offence under Sections 498A, 307, 323, 504, 506 and
109 r/w 34 of IPC.
2.
Accused No.1 is the husband, accused No.2 is
the mother-in-law and accused No.3 to 5 are the sisters
in laws of respondent No.2.
3.
Accused Nos.1 to 4 are present and they are
identified by their counsel Sri.Dayanand M. Bandi.
Respondent No.2 is present and she is identified by her
counsel Sri. Vijay Malali. It is submitted by both the
counsels that the matter is settled, application under
Section 320 r/w Section 482 of of Cr.P.C. is filed with
5
joint affidavit of accused No.1 Malatesh and respondent
No.2 Rashmi. Respondent No.2 in the said joint affidavit
has sworn as under :
“