BENCH AT DHARWAD
CHANNAVASAVESWAR GINNING FACTORY – Appellant
Versus
YALLAPPA S/O FAKKIRAPPA LOKAPUR – Respondent
MFA 25365 2012
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
M.F.A.No.25365/2012 c/w
M.F.A. CROB.No.100107/2014 (WC)
IN MFA NO 25365 OF 2012
BETWEEN
CHANNAVASAVESWAR GINNING FACTORY,
REP: BY ITS OWNER
SHRI. VEERUPAKSHAPPA
S/O BARAMAPPA BIDARAGADDI,
R/O KARJAGI, TQ:DIST: HAVERI.
.....APPELLANT
(BY SRI B M PATIL, ADV.)
AND
YALLAPPA S/O FAKKIRAPPA LOKAPUR,
AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: NILL,
R/O HAVERI, TQ:DIST: HAVERI.
…..RESPONDENT
(BY SRI D M MANJUNATH, ADV.)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.30 OF W.C. ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DT:19.06.2012, PASSED IN W.C.A NF -
91/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND
COMMISSIONER
FOR
WORKMENS
COMPENSATION,
SUB-
DIVISION-2,
HAVERI
DISTRICT
HAVERI
AWARDING
THE
COMPENSATION OF RS.2,08,234/- WITH INTEREST AT THE
RATE OF 12% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION AND SHALL
: 2 :
BE DEPOSITED WITHIN ONE MONTH FROM THE DATE OF THE
ORDER.
IN MFA.CROB NO 100107 OF 2014
BETWEEN
YELLAPPA LOKAPUR S/O. FAKKIRAPPA
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
VIJAYANAGAR BADAVANE
HAVERI.
.....CROSS OBJECTOR
(BY SRI D M MANJUNATH, ADV.)
AND
CHANNABASAVESHWARA
GINNING FACTORY
BY ITS OWNER : SHREE VEERUPAKSHAPPA
S/O. BARAMAPPA BIDARGADDI
R/O. KARJAGI, TQ and DIST: HAVERI
…..RESPONDENT
THIS MFA.CROB IN MFA NO.25365/2012 FILED U/O.41
RULE 22 OF CPC R/W SEC.30(1) OF WC ACT, 1923, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.06.2012 PASSED IN
W.C.N.F.NO.91/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER
AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION AT
HAVERI, PRAYING TO ENHANCE AND MODIFY THE AWARD.
THIS APPEAL AND CROSS OBJECTION COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned
counsel
for
respondent
in
M.F.A.
No.25365/2012 has filed a memo reporting the death of
sole respondent on 22.01.2018.
: 3 :
2.
The sole respondent is the sole cross objector
in M.F.A.Crob.No.100107/2014.
3.
Memo is placed on record.
4.
Steps have not been taken to bring the legal
representatives of the sole respondent within the statutory
period. Hence, appeal as well as cross objection are
dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Naa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.