HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVAYOGI S/O. MALLIKARJUN MAMALEPATTANSHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Learned HCGP accepts notice for the respondent-
State.
The Police, after investigation submitted the charge
sheet for the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of the
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 alleging that food grains
meant for distribution under public distribution scheme were
stacked unauthorisedly by the petitioner-accused No.2. The
learned Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet, took
cognizance for the aforesaid offences and issued summons.
Taking exception to the same, this petition is filed.
3.
Learned
counsel
appearing
for
the
petitioner
submits that the petitioner-accused No.2 is a registered dealer
for purchase and sale of food grains and in the absence of
corroborative material that the food grains seized in the
- 3 -
godown of the petitioner-accused No.2 were meant for
distribution under public distribution scheme, the charge sheet
filed by the police is without any substance. He further submits
that food grains is alleged to have been seized without
registering First Information Report at the first instance and the
same is impermissible and violative of the Article 21 of the
Constitution of India.
4.
On the other hand, the learned HCGP appearing for
the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.