HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVAYOGI S/O. MALLIKARJUN MAMALEPATTANASHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Learned HCGP accepts notice for the respondent-
State.
The Police, after investigation submitted the charge
sheet for the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of the
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 alleging that food grains
meant for distribution under public distribution scheme were
stacked unauthorisedly by the petitioner-accused. The learned
Magistrate after accepting the charge sheet, took cognizance
for the aforesaid offences and issued summons. Taking
exception to the same, this petition is filed.
3.
Learned
counsel
appearing
for
the
petitioner
submits that the petitioner-accused is a registered dealer for
purchase and sale of food grains and in the absence of
- 3 -
corroborative material that the food grains seized in the
godown of the petitioner-accused were meant for distribution
under public distribution scheme, the charge sheet filed by the
police is without any substance. He further submits that food
grains is alleged to have been seized without registering First
Information Report at the first instance and the same is
impermissible and violative of the Article 21 of the Constitution
of India.
4.
On the other hand, the learned HCGP appearing for
the respondent-Sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.