HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
LALITHA W/O LAXMAN LAMANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/101112/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101112 OF 2021
BETWEEN
LALITHA W/O LAXMAN LAMANI
AGED 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O. KABALAYTHAKATTI TANDA,
TQ AND DIST. GADAG-582101
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SRINIVAS B NAIK, ADV.)
AND
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
THROUGH GADAG RURAL POLICE STATION
DIST. GADAG-582101
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.RAMESH B.CHIGARI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO THE
PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 IN SC NO.10/2021 ON
THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
COURT, GADAG, (IN CRIME NO.46/2020 OF GADAG
RURAL
POLICE
STATION)
REGISTERED
FOR
THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 302 R/W 34
OF IPC.
THIS
CRIMINAL
PETITION
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
This petition is filed by accused No.2 under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘Cr.P.C.’, for brevity)
seeking bail in Crime No.46/2020 (pending in SC
No.10/2021 on the file of Prl. District and Sessions
Judge, Gadag) of Gadag Rural Police Station for the
offences punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 34
of The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘IPC’, for brevity).
2.
The case of the prosecution is that
complainant is one Ramesh Lamani who is brother’s
son of deceased Laxman. Deceased Laxman had
married this petitioner and out of marriage they had
one son-CW-6/Devaraj. It is further stated that since
8 to 10 years deceased and this petitioner had shifted
to Goa for avocation and they were doing fishing
business, for the purpose of business the deceased
3
had purchased vehicle and he had appointed accused
No.1 as driver. The accused No.1 during course of
employment came in contact with this petitioner and
they both had developed relationship. Due to Covid-
19 pandemic the deceased and petitioner had shifted
back to native, the deceased under intoxication used
to shout at petitioner and accused no.1 since they had
developed relationship. The complainant and his
friend intervened and advised the accused No.1 to
discontinue the relationship. The accused No.1 did
not heed to the advice and threatened to do away
with the deceased. On 30.09.2020 the complainant
after finishing his dinner was sleeping and on
01.10.2020 at about 6 a.m. the petitioner/accused
No.2 came to complainant’s house and raised hue and
cry and informed that deceased was not getting up
from sleep. Immediately, complainant, his mother
rushed to petitioner’s house and saw deceased was
4
sleeping. After noticing the deceased had died, and
after enquiry the petitioner alleged to have revealed
that in night deceased came to house in drunken
position, thereafter, she provided food and deceased
slept and in the morning when she tried to awake him,
he was not responding. Thereafter, elder of the
village decided to cremate the deceased and while
washing the body of deceased it was noticed some
ligature mark in and around neck, therefore, again
elders enquired the petitioner and it is alleged that
petitioner has revealed that since deceased was
constantly harassing the petitioner raising doubt about
the relationship, the petitioner and accused No.1
decided to do away with the deceased and as such
petitioner
along
with
accused
No.1
killed
the
deceased. The said complaint came to be registered
in Crime No.46/2020 of Gadag Rural Police Station for
the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w Section
5
34 of IPC. The petitioner and accused No.1 were
arrested on 02.10.2020 and Investigation Officer has
filed charge sheet for the offence punishable under
Section 302 R/w Section 34 of IPC and the case is now
pending on the fi