SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. RESHMA W/O BANDENAWAZ AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
NEKRTC THROUGH – Respondent
MFA/200446/2015



1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, KALABURAGI

BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

AND

DR.JAMBAYYA SWAMY HIREMATH, MEMBER

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.200446/2015(MV)

(Lok Adalat No.370/2016)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. RESHMA

W/O LATE BANDENAWAZ

AGE: 28 YEARS

OCC:HOUSEHOLD

2.

ASHAMMA D/O LATE BANDENAWAZ

AGE: 10 YEARS MINOR

OCC:STUDENT

3.

SHAKERA D/O LATE BANDENAWAZ

AGE: 8 YEARS, MINOR

OCC:STUDENT

2

4.

SHAIDABEGUM D/O LATE BANDENAWAZ

AGE: 6 YEARS, MINOR

OCC:STUDENT

5.

SHEKSAB S/O LATE BANDENAWAZ

AGE: 4 YEARS MINOR

OCC:NIL

6.

SMT. GULABJI W/O SHEKANNA

AGE: 49 YEARS

OCC:HOUSEHOLD

APPELLANT NO.2 TO 5 ARE MINORS

U/G OF APPELLANT NO.1 SMT. RESHMA

ALL ARE R/O VILLAGE AURAD (B)

TQ. & DIST.KALABURAGI- 585 103.

... APPELLANTS

(BY SRI NAGARAJ PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

NEKRTC THROUGH

ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

SARIGE BHAVAN OPP: KBN HOSPITAL

KALABURAGI- 585 102.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SUBHASH MALLAPUR, ADVOCATE )

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.12.2014 PASSED IN MVC

NO.684/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE & MACT AT KALABURAGI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE

3

CLAIM

PETITION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT

OF

COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE

LOK ADALATH AFTER BEING REFERRED VIDE ORDER DATED

28.01.2016, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS

PASSED.

CONCILIATION ORDER

The

learned

counsel

for

the

appellant

and

the

representative of Respondent-Corporation along with its counsel

are present.

2.

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. The

Appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the Respondent-

Corporation has agreed to pay a global compensation of

`4,60,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Sixty Thousand Only), in

addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and

final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is filed on behalf of

the parties to this effect.

4

3.

The Respondent-Corporation has agreed to deposit the

said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date

of preparation of Award, failing which the said amount shall

carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of default, till

the date of deposit.

4.

Order for deposit, payment and apportionment made by

the Tribunal will also hold good for enhanced compensation.

5.

The Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms

of the Joint Memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand

modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

MEMBER

SBN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top