SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
SHASHIKANT S/O FAKIRAPPA YEDRAMANI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE THROUGH AND ORS – Respondent
WP/202715/2015



W.P.No.202715/2015

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

WRIT PETITION No.202715/2015 (LB-RES)

Between:

1.

Shashikant

S/o Fakirappa Yedramani

Aged about 45 years

Occ: Petty Business

R/o Wilding Work Shop

City Bus Stand, Super Market

Kalaburagi.

2.

Sheik Mohammed

S/o Mohammed Ahmed Ali

Aged about 42 years

Occ: Choice Centre

Near City Bus Stand

Super Market, Kalaburagi.

... Petitioners

(By Sri Raja Venkatappa Naik, Advocate)

And:

1.

The State through

its Deputy Commissioner

Kalaburagi-585101.

2.

The Assistant Commissioner

W.P.No.202715/2015

2

Main Road, Jagat Circle

Kalaburagi-585101

3.

The Executive Engineer

PWD Office, Old Jewargi Road

Kalaburagi-585102

4.

Assistant Executive Engineer

PWD Public Garden, Sub-Division

Kalaburagi-585102

5.

Junior Engineers

PWD Public Garden, Sub-Division

Kalaburagi-585102

6

The Commissioner

City Corporation, Public Garden

Kalaburagi-585102

7.

The Zonal Commissioner

City Municipal Corporation

Near Govt. Multipurpose High School

Kalaburagi-585102.

8.

Smt. Zeenat Banu Hussaini

W/o Syed Shah Hazrath Hussaini

Aged about 57 years

Occ: Household

R/o Badepur village

Tq. & Dist. Kalaburagi-585104.

9.

Syed Shah Ahmed Hussaini

S/o Syed Shah Hazrath Hussaini

Aged about 35 years

Occ: Sajjada Nasheen

R/o Badepur village

Tq. & Dist. Kalaburagi-585104.

... Respondents

(By Smt. Anuradha M. Desai, GA for R1 to R7)

W.P.No.202715/2015

3

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227

of the Constitution of India praying to issue writ of

mandamus in favour of the petitioners and against

respondents Nos.1 to 7 holding that respondents Nos.1 to

7 without authority of law and without service of notice

and without affording an opportunity of being heard the

petitioner illegally demolished the petitioners premises

Schedule of the property.

This petition coming on for Orders, this day, the

Court made the following:-

ORDER

Sri Raja Venkatappa Naik, learned counsel for the

petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to

withdraw the writ petition. The said memo is taken on

record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NB*

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top