HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK G.NIJAGANNAVAR,K.N.PHANEENDRA
MANIKYA S/O LACHMYA PAWAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.A/3533/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3533/2012
BETWEEN
MANIKYA S/O LACHMYA PAWAR
OCC: BEGGAR
R/O SHANKARGAON
TQ. PANDARPUR
DIST. SHOLAPUR (MAHARASHTRA)
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI MAHANTESH DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH: REVOOR P S AT REVOOR
TQ. AFZALPUR
DIST. GULBARGA
REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH, AT GULBARGA
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI PRAKASH YELI, ADDL. SPP)
2
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S. 374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER
OF SENTECE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF FAST TRACK -
III AT GULBARGA, IN S.C. NO. 284/2005 ON DATED 23.08.2007 BY
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE
APPELLANT / ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
U/S 326, 397, 302 IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD, RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT THIS DAY, ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR J., DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant/accused No.1
being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and
sentence dated 23.08.2007 in Sessions Case No.284/2005
for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 397 and
302 IPC. The appellant/accused Manikaya is convicted
and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three
years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-in default, to undergo
further imprisonment for six months for the offences
3
punishable under Section 326 IPC. Further, he is also
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven
years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to suffer
imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable
under Section 397 IPC and he is also sentenced to
imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in
default, to undergo further imprisonment for one year for
the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.
2.
The prosecution case in brief is that on the
complaint was filed by one of the injured victim namely
Hanamantraya S/o Choudappa Jewargi of Arjunagi village
wherein it is alleged that himself and his son Dattatreya
had cultivated the groundnut and carrot crops in their
land. As such, everyday they were sleeping in their land
to protect the crops. On 25.04.2004, the complainant and
his son were sleeping in their farm land. The complainant
was sleeping on the country made cot and his son
Dattatreya was sleeping on the ground nearby him.
4
During night at about 3.00 a.m., three unknown persons
came there and stood around them. The complainant
woke-up and asked as to who they are. At that time, one
of them assaulted with axe on the left side of the head and
another person who was holding the long knife (jambe) on
his left hand. When the complainant tried to getup,
another blow was given with the back portion namely
handle of the axe. On hearing of the cry of the
complainant, his son Dattatreya woke-up and tried to go
near his father. But, the said persons assaulted him with
the long knife (jambe) on his stomach and ran away from
the spot. Immediately, the complainant went towards the
neighbouring land owners and informed about the assault
done by the said persons. When the complainant and
neighbouring land owner Fakirsab came to the spot, his
son Dattatreya was lying on the ground and was dead. On
registering the complaint, the investigation was completed
and charge sheet was filed against the accused persons for
5
the offences punishable under Sections 397, 326 and 302
IPC.
3.
After committal of the case to the Sessions
Court and on appearance of the accused persons, charges
were framed for the aforesaid offences. The trial was
concluded. In order to prove the case, the prosecution
examined 15 witnesses as PWs.1 to 15 and documents
Exs.P1 to P14 were marked. The material objects were
marked as MOs.1 to 10. After recording the evidence, the
statement under Section 31