IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
MFA NO.200805/2018(G & WC)
A/W.
MFA CROB. NO.200027/2019
IN MFA NO.200805/2018
BETWEEN:
SIDDAMMA W/O. NARSINGRAO GADGIKAR,
AGE: 65 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. H.NO.9-5-501,
ADASH COLONY,
NEAR SAI TEMPLE,
BIDAR
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
VISHWANATH,
S/O. MALHARRAO SRINGERE,
MFA No.200805/2018 A/w.
MFA CROB. No.200027/2019
2
AGE: 75 YEARS
OCC: PENSIONER
2.
SUSHILABAI,
W/O. VISHWANATH SRINGERE,
AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER,
BOTH ARE R/O. 'MAHESH KUNJ',
KHORI GALLI,
LATUR – 413 510
(M.S.)
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED
UNDER SECTION 47(g) OF G & WC ACT, PRAYING TO
CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 11.04.2018 PASSED BY THE COURT OF
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, BIDAR, IN G & WC
NO.03/2013 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PRESENT
APPEAL AND DISMISS THE PETITION IN ENTIRETY.
IN MFA CROB. NO.200027/2019
BETWEEN:
1.
VISHWANATH S/O. MALHARRAO SRINGERE
AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER,
R/O. 'MAHESH KUNJ' KHORI GALLI,
LATUR - 413 510
(M.S.)
2.
SUSHILABAI W/O. VISHWANATH SRINGERE
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER,
R/O. 'MAHESH KUNJ' KHORI GALLI,
MFA No.200805/2018 A/w.
MFA CROB. No.200027/2019
3
LATUR - 413 510
(M.S.)
... CROSS-OBJECTORS
(BY SRR HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SIDDAMMA W/O. NARASINGRAO GADGIKAR
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. H.NO.9-5-501,
ADARSH COLONY,
NEAR SAI TEMPLE,
BIDAR-585 401
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA CROB. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 41 RULE 22
OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
11.04.2018 IN G & WC NO.3/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM AT BIDAR INSOFAR AS IT
PERTAINS TO REJECTION OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONERS
AS
GUARDIAN
AND
CONSEQUENTLY
APPOINT
THE
PETITIONERS AS GUARDIAN, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.
THE MFA AND THE MFA CROB. COMING ON FOR
ORDERS,
THROUGH
PHYSICAL
HEARING/VIDEO
CONFERENCE, THIS DAY SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
The appeal and the cross-objection have become
infructuous. Because the Ward – Shreya Gadgikar has
4
attained majority. She is present before the Court and
submits that her present age is 19 years and is a
student of II year Pre-University Course at Davanagere.
Taking note of the fact that the Ward has
attained majority we dismiss the appeal and also the
cross-objections.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties draw our
attention to certain observations made by the court
below and seek to expunge the same. The observation
is that after taking the opinion of the ward i.e., Kumari
Shreya Gadikar, the Deputy Commissioner, Davanagere
or Bidar may be appointed as her guardian. And in the
operative portion of the order of the court below, there is
another direction that respondent therein i.e., Siddamma
shall be kept in civil prison in case she would fail to
submit the statement of accounts and that she should be
sent to civil prison to serve sentence for a period of six
5
months
for
having
removed
the
ward
from
the
jurisdiction of the court.
4.
Having regard to the circumstances made out
in the appeal filed by respondent – Siddamma, we are of
the opinion that directions given by the court below to
commit her to civil prison in case of her failure to furnish
accounts, and for the purpose of serving sentence for six
months can also be set aside and ordered accordingly.
As regards appointment of Deputy Commissioner as
guardian, we state that since the girl has attained
majority, there is no need to appoint the Deputy
Commissioner as guardian.
5.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed
memo producing Bank Statement for the period from
07.06.2013 to 04.01.2023, which shows that a sum of
Rs.1,22,52,636/- is available in the joint fixed deposit
account in the names of Kumari Shreya Gadikar and her
grandmother – Siddamma Gadgikar, at Axis Bank,
6
Chandanagar Branch, Serilingampally, R.R. District,
Telangana. Kumari Shreya Gadgikar submits that the
fixed deposit be continued in the joint account and she
has no objection for that. Therefore till she completes
her education, the joint account shall continue.
6.
Kumari Shreya is at liberty to meet any of her
relatives on the paternal and maternal side.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SBS*
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.