1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT KALABURAGI
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.200028/2016
BETWEEN
SRI.KANKAREDDY S/O GUDDADAYYA
AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:DRIVER & OWNER
OF VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-36-9927
R/O SAMUDRA VILLAGE, TQ:DEVADURGA
DIST:RAICHUR PIN-584101
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI GANESH NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH DEVADURGA POLICE STATION
TQ:DEVADURGA, DIST:RAICHUR-584101
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
ALLOW THE REVISION AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE
JMFC, DEODURG IN C.C.NO.370/2010, CONFIRMED BY THE
PRL.
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AT
RAICHUR
IN
CRL.APPEAL.NO.05/2015 DATED 30TH JAN 2016 AND ACQUIT
THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGES LEVELLED AGAINST HIM.
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and
the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent - State. Perused the records.
2.
This revision petition is filed by the accused, who
suffered an order of conviction in C.C.No.370/2010 on the
file of the JMFC, Devadurga by Judgment dated 14.01.2015,
whereby, he has been convicted for the offences punishable
under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and under Section 187 of the
Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘IMV Act), which
was modified in Criminal Appeal No.5/2015, on the file of the
II Principal Sessions Judge, Raichur by judgment dated
30.01.2016.
3. Brief facts of the case are as under:
A complaint came to be lodged by one Hanumantha
S/o. Siddanna, Devadurga police registered a case in Crime
3
No.37/2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 279,
337, 338 and 304-A of IPC and under Section 187 of IMV
Act. In the complaint, it is contended that the complainant
had
three
sons
and
a
daughter
and
her
daughter
Basalingamma was studying in 7th standard. In order to get
a photograph for the purpose of examination, himself and his
daughter Basalingamma were proceeding to Arakera village
and they were standing in the bus stand at about 3.15 p.m.,
at that juncture, a Tata pick up van bearing No.KA-36/9927
came there and they contracted to proceed in the said
vehicle and they boarded the same on the back side of the
vehicle. The driver of the said vehicle drove the said vehicle
in a rash and negligent manner and as such, in order to
avoid a girl, who was crossing the road, he steered the
vehicle on the left side and because of the rash and negligent
driving, the vehicle turtled. After dashing the said girl,
himself and her daughter got injured and the girl, who was
moving on the road sustained grievous injuries and was died.
The driver of the vehicle left the vehicle there itself and ran
away from the spot. The police after registering the case,
4
investigated the matter and filed the charge sheet against
the accused for the aforesaid offences.
4.
The presence of the accused was secured before
the learned Magistrate and plea was recorded. The accused
pleaded not guilty and as such, trial was held.
5.
In order to prove the case of the prosecution,
prosecution in all examined 10 witnesses as PWs.1 to 10 and
relied on 14 documentary evidence, which were marked and
exhibited as Exs.P1 to P14.
6.
On conclusion of the prosecution evidence,
accused statement as contemplated under Section 313
Cr.P.C was recorded, wherein accused denied all the
incriminatory
circumstances
found
in
the
prosecution
evidence. However, accused did not choose to lead any
evidence nor place his version on record by adducing oral
evidence or by filing a written submission as is contemplated
under Section 313(5) Cr.P.C.
5
7.
Thereafter, learned Magistrate heard the parties
in detail and after considering the oral and documentary
evidence on record, convicted the accused for the aforesaid
offences and sentenced as under:
Offences
Imprisonment
Fine
Default
sentence
Section 279
of IPC
One year simple
imprisonment
Rs.1,000/-
Simple
imprisonment
for six months
Section 338
of IPC
Six
months
simple
imprisonment
Rs.1,000/-
Simple
imprisonment
for 45 days
Section
304-A
of
IPC
Two years simple
imprisonment
Rs.3,000/-
Simple
imprisonment
for six months
Section 187
of IMV Act
-
Rs.500/-
Simple
imprisonment
for 15 days
8.
Being aggrieved by the same, accused preferred
an appeal in Criminal Appeal No.5/2015. The learned Judge
in the First Appellate Court after securing the records and
hearing the parties in detail, allowed the appeal in part by
maintaining the order of conviction of the accused for the
offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A
of IPC and under Section 187 of IMV Act and set aside the
sentence passed by the trial Magistrate for the offence
6
punishable under Section 279 of IPC and held that both
substanti