HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BHEEMRAO S/O MALLAPPA HOSADODDI – Appellant
Versus
HAWAPPA KAMBLE S/O PEERAPPA KAMBLE, – Respondent
MFA/200115/2015
MFA No.200115/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
MFA No.200115/2015 (MV)
Between:
Bheemrao S/o Mallappa Hosadoddi,
Age: 51 years, Occ: Member of Gram Panchayat
and Business,
R/o Village Byalhalli-K, Tq. Bhalki,
Dist. Bidar-585328.
... Appellant
(By Sri. Basavaraj.R.Math, Advocate)
And:
1.
Hawappa Kamble son of Peerappa Kamble,
Age: 68 years, Occ: Labour.
2.
Sundramma W/o Hawappa Kamble,
Age: 63 years, Occ: Housewife,
<
Both are resident of village Chickpet,
Tq. and Dist. Bidar-584101.
3.
Nagraj S/o Shamrao,
Age: Major, Occ: Driver,
Resident of village Byalhalli-K,
Tq. Bhalki, Dist. Bidar-585328.
... Respondents
(By Sri. Sudhakar Rao, Advocate for R1 & 2;
Notice to R3 served)
MFA No.200115/2015
2
This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of M.V.Act,
praying to call for records and set aside the impugned
judgment and award dated 10.12.2014 passed by the Prl.
MACT and Prl. District Judge at Bidar in MVC No.84/2012,
in the interest of justice and equity.
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the
Court delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
This appeal, though listed for admission, is taken
up for final disposal with the consent of the learned
counsel appearing for the parties.
2.
This appeal is filed by the owner of the
vehicle against the award of compensation to the
parents of the deceased in MVC No.84/2012 by its
judgment and award dated 10.12.2014.
3.
Parties will be referred to as per their
ranking before the Claims Tribunal.
4.
Brief facts leading to the filing of the
present appeal are that on 03.07.2011 the deceased
MFA No.200115/2015
3
along with other labourers were loading goods into the
tractor bearing Reg.No.MYI-4851 for transporting it
from one place to the one other and after loading,
they were traveling in the same vehicle. The tractor
was being driven in a rash and negligent manner, due
to which the driver of the vehicle lost control resulting
in turning of the vehicle upside down. The deceased
sustained grievous injuries to the vital parts of the
body and died while taking treatment at Government
Hospital, Bidar. The owner of the Tractor-appellant
herein entered into a settlement with the wife of the
deceased by paying her Rs.3,00,000/- as amount of
compensation and closed the issue. Later the parents
of the deceased, claiming to be the dependents of the
deceased
filed
MVC
No.84/2012
claiming
compensation on the death of their son/deceased.
The Tribunal on the basis of the pleadings of the
parties even while noticing the fact that the claim was
MFA No.200115/2015
4
settled with Kasturibai, wife of the deceased awarded
compensation of Rs.6,50,000/- to the parents of the
deceased. It is this order i.e. called in question by the
appellant-owner of the vehicle in this appeal.
5.
Heard
Sri.
Basavaraj.R.Math,
learned
counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Sudhakar
Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent
Nos.1 and 2.
6.
The learned counsel appearing for the
owner of the vehicle Sri. Basavaraj.R.Math would
contend that the owner of the vehicle tendered
evidence that she has settled the matter with the wife
of the deceased, but did not examine the wife of the
deceased before the Tribunal and would contend that
fastening of the liability of payment of compensation
of Rs.6,50,000/- to the parents of the deceased who
were never the dependents is erroneous.
MFA No.200115/2015
5
7.
I have given my anxious consideration to
the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
parties and perused the records.
8.
The contention of the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant-owner of the vehicle
appears plausible as in his evidence he submits that
he has given Rs.3,00,000/- to the wife of the
deceased as a settlement/compensation for the death
of her husband