HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KUBRA BEE W/O LATE YOUSUF ALI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
VEERSHETTY S/O MANIKAPA MARKHALE AND ANR – Respondent
MFA/30070/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.G.M.PATIL
MFA NO.30070/2013 (MV)
BETWEEN:
1.
Kubra Bee W/o Late Yousuf Ali,
Age: 30 years, Occ: Household,
2.
Vazir Bee W/o Shaik Ahmed,
Age: 54 years, Occ: Household,
3.
Shaik Ahmed S/o Ali Sab Pinjar,
Age: 57 years, Occ: Labour,
All are R/o Kadwad, Tq: Bidar-585401.
... Appellants
(By Sri.Basavaraj R.Math, Advocate)
AND:
1.
Veershetty S/o Manikappa Markhale,
Age: Major, Occ: Business,
R/o H.No.104, Kadwad
Tq: Bidar – 585 401.
(owner of Lorry No.AP-12/U-2214)
2. The Manager,
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.,
Walchand Hirachand Marg, Mumbai
Through its Branch Manager, Branch/
Division Office No.4,
2
8th Block Asian Plaza, Station Road,
Gulbarga Near S.V.Patel Chowk 585 101.
(Vide Policy No.109001334529 Cover Note
No.1407782334003178)
(Valid from 13-02-2010 to 12-02-2011)
... Respondents
(By Smt.Preeti Patil Melkundi Advocate for R-2)
(Notice to R1 dispensed with V/O dt.25/08/2014)
This MFA filed under Section 173 (1) of MV Act against
the judgment and award dated: 18-11-2011 passed in MVC
No.32/2010 on the file of Prl. Senior Civil Judge & MACT II
at Bidar partly allowing the petition & seeking for
enhancement of compensation.
This appeal coming for orders on this day, the Court
delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Though the matter is posted for Orders, it is taken
up for hearing.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for appellants and
respondent No.2/Insurance Company.
3.
This
appeal
is
preferred
against
the
Judgment and award dated: 18-11-2011 passed by Prl.
3
Senior Civil Judge & MACT No.II at Bidar in M.V.C
No.32/2010 awarding compensation of Rs.4,83,000/-
with interest at the rate of 6% per annum to the
claimants/appellants.
4.
The claimants/appellants have stated in the
claim petition before the Tribunal that, the deceased
Yousuf /husband of claimant No.1 and son to claimant
Nos.2 & 3 met with motor vehicle accident on 10-05-
2010, at 9.15 p.m., on Bidar - Mannaekheli road at
Chatnalli cross, due to user of Lorry bearing Reg.
No.AP-12/U-2214, being driven by the driver of the said
vehicle in a rash and negligent manner. The Bagdal
police have registered a case in Crime No.84/2010
against the driver of the said vehicle. The claimants
have stated that, the deceased was hale and healthy
and working as a Milk vendor and coolie and earning
Rs.8,000/- per month. Due to untimely death, they
4
have lost their dependency. Therefore they have
claimed compensation of Rs.17,80,000/-.
5.
Respondent No.1 though appeared before the
Tribunal,
did
not
file
any
written
statement.
Respondent No.2 appeared and filed written statement
and contested the matter. It was contended that, the
compensation claimed by the claimants is on the higher
side. The liability of the insurer is subject to the terms
and conditions of the policy and also the driver holding
valid and effective driving license. There is violation of
Policy condition and the Driver or claimants have not
produce any necessary documents of vehicle in
question, permission U/Sec.170 of M.V.Act is sought
for. On these grounds it is prayed to dismiss the
petition.
6.
The Tribunal on the basis of the pleadings
framed the Issues.
5
7. The claimant No.1 was examined as PW.1 and
got
marked
documents
Ex.P.1
to
Ex.P.5.
The
respondent No.2-company has not produced any
documents nor produced any oral evidence.
8. The Tribunal after hearing both the sides
passed
the
impugned
Judgment
by
awarding
compensation of Rs.4,83,000/- with interest at the rate
of 6% per annum from the date of petition till
realization.
9.
The
learned
counsel
appearing
for
claimants/appellants submits before this court that, the
income of the deceased taken at Rs.3,500/- per month
is on the lower side and that the Tribunal ought to have
taken the income of the deceased at Rs.8,000/-