1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200274/2022
Between:
Smt. Manisha W/o Ramesh Rathod,
Age: 36 years, Occ: Household work,
R/o. Panchasheel Nagar,
Near Vijayapura-Indi Road,
Indi, Tq.Indi, Dist. Vijayapura-586209.
… Petitioner
(By Sri R.S.Lagali, Advocate)
And:
Vivekanand S/o Kalappa Badiger,
Age: 35 years, Occ: Business,
R/o. Indi town, Tq. Indi,
Dist: Vijayapura-586209.
… Respondent
(By Sri Ganesh Naik, Advocate)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., praying to allow this criminal petition and thereby
quash the order dated 28.01.2022 passed in Criminal Case
No.2579/2021
(Arising
out
of
Private
Complaint
No.64/2021) by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Court, Indi on the
application filed U/s 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act by
the respondent herein, thereby directing the petitioner to
deposit 20% of the cheque amount as the interim
compensation.
2
This petition coming on for Admission this day, the
Court passed the following:
The petitioner is before this Court seeking to quash
the order dated 28.01.2022 passed by the learned Civil
Judge and JMFC, Indi, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial
Court’) in C.C.No.2579/2021 arising out of Private
Complaint No.64/2021 on the application filed under
Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for
short ‘N.I. Act’).
2.
Heard Sri R.S.Lagali, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri Ganesh Naik, learned counsel for
respondent. Perused the material on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated
28.01.2022 passed by the Trial Court allowing the
application filed by the complainant under Section 143A of
the N.I. Act and directing the accused to deposit 20% of
the cheque amount within 60 days from the date of the
3
order. Learned counsel submitted that the complainant has
filed an application for grant of interim compensation
assigning reason that the complainant is in need of money
for performing marriage of his sister that is to be held on
21.02.2022, but the Trial Court has not discussed anything
about the reason as to why the application is to be allowed
and why 20% of the cheque amount is to be awarded as
interim compensation. Therefore, the impugned order is
not a speaking order and it lacks reasoning.
4.
Learned counsel places reliance on the decision
of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Smt.
Vijaya vs. Shekharappa and another1 in support of his
contention to contend that the Trial Court should have
given reasons for awarding interim compensation that too
of 20% while exercising discretion under Section 143A of
the N.I. Act. Accordingly, he prays for setting aside the
impugned order by allowing the petition.
1 CRL.P. No.100261/2022 dated 17.02.2022
4
5.
Per
contra,
learned
counsel
for
the
respondent/complainant supporting the impugned order
passed by the Trial Court submitted that discretion
contemplated under Section 143A of the N.I. Act for
awarding interim compensation after recording the plea
was exercised in a judicious manner. Sufficient reasons
are assigned for exercising such jurisdiction. Therefore, it
cannot be said that the Trial Court has blindly proceeded to
allow the application and directed payment of interim
compensation under Section 143A of the N.I. Act. By no
stretch of imagination, it can be said that the impugned
order lacks application of mind and exercise of jurisdiction
was not judicious. Therefore, decision of this Court in
Smt. Vijaya’s case (supra) is not at all applicable to the
facts of the case.
6.
Learned counsel further submitted that the
complainant before the Trial Court is already examined.
The accused has not chosen to cross-examine the
complainant and now the matter is posted for recording
5
statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.,
which shows that the petitioner/accused is not willing to
co-operate with the trial Court in disposal of the matter
expeditiously, but on the other hand, she is willing to drag
on the matter infinitely. Therefore, he prays for dismissal
of the petition as devoid of merits.
7.
In view of the rival contentions urged by the
learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would
arise for my consideration is:
“Whether the impugned order is liable
to be quashed invoking inherent power
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.? What order?”
My answer to the above point is in ‘Negative’ for the
following:
R E A S O N S
8.
The complainant had filed an application under
Section 143A of the N.I. Act, before recording the plea of
the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138
of the N.I. Act. The said application came to be dismissed
6
by
the
Trial
Court
vide
order
dated
29.10.2021.
Thereafter, plea was recorded. The complainant has filed
another application under Section 143A of the N.I. Act
seeking for grant of interim compensation and directing
the accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount. The
said application came to be allowed vide order da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.