- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:7147
CRL.A No. 200037 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200037/2019
BETWEEN:
SHANTAPPA
S/O. SHIVAGUNDAPPA KALMANI
AGED ABOUT 45 YEAS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O. HAVINAL,
TQ.SHORAPUR,
DIST.YADGIRI.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI SHIVA KUMAR MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE THROUGH
SHORAPUR POLICE STATION,
DIST.YADGIRI
(REPRESENTED BY STATE PP)
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. ANITA M. REDDY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
374(2) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
IN S.C. NO.3/2015 AND SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
PASSED
BY
THE
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
YADGIR,
ON
17.01.2019 CONVICTING THE APPELLANT FOR THE
Digitally signed by
SHILPA R
TENIHALLI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:7147
CRL.A No. 200037 of 2019
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 324 OF IPC, AND
APPELLANT BE SET AT LIBERTY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DICTATING
JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the
learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent -
State.
2.
The appellant has filed this appeal under
Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by
the District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri (for short 'trial
Court') in S.C. No.3/2015 dated 17.01.2019 for the
offence under Section 324 of IPC.
3.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court. The
appellant is the accused and the respondent is the
complainant - State.
- 3 -
4.
Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
a)
On
14.04.2014
PW3
-
Channappa
S/o.
Sharanappa filed a complaint alleging that he is resident of
Havinal Village, he has three daughters, by name, Geetha,
Sangeeta,
Bhagyashree
and
two
sons
by
name,
Sharanabasava and Basavaraj; his elder daughter Geetha
is married and they are residing in the same house.
Accused is none other than his uncle's son and happens to
be his brother, he and accused are residing in the house
beside each other and they pass through a single main
door to enter the house. Accused was in the habit of
quarreling with the complainant and his family members
under intoxication condition and always demanding for
partition of the house. On many occasions the elders of
the family got advised accused regarding partition of the
house, but he did not heed the advise of elders. On
14.04.2014, the complainant and his wife Kasturi had
been to Shorapur for attending some personal work and
when his mother and his children were in the house at
4:00 p.m., accused took quarrel with PW4 - Sangeeta and
- 4 -
assaulted her with axe on head and caused bleeding
injuries. Hence, PW3 lodged complaint. Based on the
complaint the case has been registered against the
appellant and there after charge-sheet has been filed
against accused for the offence punishable under Sections
323, 324, 326, 307, 354, 504 and 506 of IPC.
b)
After
filing
of
the
charge
sheet,
the
jurisdictional Magistrate took cognizance of the alleged
offences
under
Section
190(1)(b)
of
Cr.P.C.,
and
committed the case to the Court of Sessions. The trial
Court after hearing both side, framed the Charge against
accused for the aforesaid offences, for which accused
pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
c)
The prosecution in order to prove its case in all
examined 15 witnesses as PWs.1 to 15 and got marked
Exs.P1 to P14 and material objects MO1 to 5. For the
defence Exs.D1 to D5 were marked. On conclusion of the
trial, the statements of accused persons were recorded by
the trial Court under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.
- 5 -
d)
The trial Court framed the following points for
consideration which is as under;
1. Whether the prosecution proves that on
14.04.2014 at about 4.00 p.m. at Havinal
Village, when the CW6, 8, 9, 10 & 11 were
sitting and talking in the house, the
accused
suddenly
abused
CW8
and
assaulted her with hands, thereby the
accused committed the offence punishable
U/Sec.
323,
354
of
IPC
beyond
all
reasonable doubts?
2.
Whether the prosecution proves that on
the alleged date, time and place, the
accused attached with axe assaulted CW6
on her both hands and caused grievous
bleeding injury to her left hand, thereby
the
accused
committed
the
offence
punishable U/Sec. 326 of IPC beyond all
reasonable doubts?
3.
Whether the prosecution proves that on
the alleged date, time and place, the
accused assaulted CW6 with axe on her
hands, thereby the accused committed the
offence punishable U/Sec. 324 of IPC
beyond all reasonable doubts?
- 6 -
4.
Whether the prosecution proves that on
the alleged date, time and place, the
accused with an intention to murder CW6
assaulted her with axe on her head and
caused bleeding injury, thereby committed
the offence punishable U/Sec. 307 of IPC
beyond all reasonable doubts?
5.
Whether the prosecution proves that on
the alleged date, time and place, the
accused a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.