1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200436/2022
Between:
Jagadish S/o Ogadram Sirvi,
Age: 56 years, Occ: Business,
Owner of Dhanalaxmi Jewellery Shop,
R/o. Hunasagi Town, Tq: Hunasagi,
Dist: Yadgir-585215.
… Petitioner
(By Sri Sanjay A.Patil, Advocate)
And:
The State of Karnataka, through
Police, Hunasagi Police Station,
Hunasagi Circle, Dist: Yadgir-585215
Represented by Addl. SPP,
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi.
… Respondent
(By Sri Prakash Yeli, Addl. SPP)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., praying to quash the impugned order dated
07.03.2022 passed by District and Sessions Judge at
Yadgir in Crl.R.P.No.3/2021 on its file thereby confirming
and upholding the order dated 19.02.2021 passed on
application filed under Section 457 of Cr.P.C. by the Addl.
Civil Judge & JMFC Shorapur, in Crime No.3/2021 on its
file, and in consequence further be pleased to allow the
application filed by the petitioner under Section 457 of
2
Cr.PC dated 16.02.2021 praying to release the seized
articles item No.1 to 299 in P.F.No.2(a)/2021, in Crime
No.3/2021 in favour of the petitioner as interim custody,
till the disposal of the main case and etc.
This petition coming on for Admission this day, the
Court passed the following:
The petitioner-informant is before this Court invoking
the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the order dated 07.03.2022
passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge at
Yadgiri
in
CRL.R.P.No.3/2021
and
the
order
dated
19.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge
and JMFC, Shorapur, on the application filed under Section
457 of Cr.P.C., in Crime No.3/2021 and consequently to
allow the application and release the seized articles at
item Nos.1 to 299 in P.F.No.2(a)/2021 in Crime No.3/2021
of Hunasagi Police Station, Yadgiri District.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner
lodged first information with Hunasagi Police Station on
13.01.2021, against unknown persons for the offences
3
punishable under Sections 365, 302 and 396 of IPC. It is
alleged that on the said date, some unknown persons
criminally trespassed into the house, assaulted the son of
the informant with sharp edged weapon and caused his
death. They said to have robbed about 1Kg gold worth
Rs.50,00,000/- and about 2 Kgs silver articles. Therefore,
he requested the police to register the case and to trace
out the culprits. Accordingly, FIR was registered in Crime
No.3/2021 for the above said offences and investigation
was undertaken. It is stated that after investigation
charge sheet came to be filed against accused Nos.1 and 2
for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 302,
120(B) r/w Section 34 of IPC.
3.
It
is
stated
that
during
the
course
of
investigation accused Nos.1 and 2 were apprehended. It is
stated that about 1.5 Kgs., of gold ornaments and 10 Kgs.,
of silver articles were recovered at their instance and
seizer of the same was reported to the jurisdictional
Magistrate.
4
4.
The informant filed an application under
Section 457 of Cr.P.C., before the learned Magistrate
seeking for interim custody of the gold ornaments and
silver articles, since all those ornaments were robbed from
his house by accused Nos.1 and 2 while committing the
offence. The said application came to be dismissed vide
order dated 19.02.2021.
5.
Being aggrieved by the rejection of his
application under Section 457 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner
filed Criminal Revision Petition No.3/2021 before the
learned District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, challenging
the order dated 19.02.2021 passed by the learned
Magistrate in Crime No.3/2021. The said revision petition
also came to be dismissed vide order dated 07.03.2022.
However, it is observed that the order will not come in the
way of the revision petitioner to file necessary application
in the pending S.C.No.56/2021, claiming both gold
ornaments and silver articles in question.
5
6.
Being aggrieved by the impugned orders
passed by both the learned Magistrate as well as the
learned Sessions Judge, the informant is before this Court
seeking interim custody of the valuables.
7.
Heard Sri Sanjay A. Patil, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Sri Prakash Yeli, learned Additional State
Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. Perused the
materials on record.
8.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that even the Investigating Officer submitted no objection
for releasing the gold and silver ornaments to the interim
custody of the informant. The accused have not claimed
ownership over the same. There are no rival claimants. But
still, both the Courts have rejected the application, only on
the ground that the informant is the native of State of
Rajasthan and if the valuables are returned to his interim
custody, there is every possibility of he not producing the
same before the Court during the trial and the trial in the
case may hamper. Therefore, the claim of the informant
6
for interim custody of the valuables is rejected only on
flimsy grounds. Hence, he prays for allowing the petition in
the ends of justice.
9.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader submitted that the learned Public Prosecutor
before the Sessions Court submitted no objection for
allowing the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.