BENCH AT KALBURAGI
SHARANAPPA @ SIDDHU S/O SIDDU MADAGUNAKI – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MALLIKARJUN S/O EGU RATHOD AND ANR – Respondent
MFA 200399 2020
MFA No.200399/2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
MFA NO.200399/2020 (MV)
Between:
Sharanappa @ Siddhu
S/o Siddhu Madagunaki
Age: 28 years, Occ: Earlier Private Service
R/o Earlier residing at Akkalkot Road Solapur
Now residig at Treasury Colony
Torvi Road, Vijayapur-586101.
... Appellant
(By Sri Basavaraj R. Math, Advocate)
And:
1.
Sri. Mallikarjun S/o Egu Rathod
Aged about 50 years, Occ: Business
R/o Ingalagi, Tq. Indi
Dist: Vijayapura-586209.
2.
The Manager Legal
Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company Ltd.
GE Plaza, Airport Road, Yerwada Pune
Pune-411006, Maharashtra.
... Respondents
(By Sri C.S. Kalburgi, Advocate for R2;
R1 is dispensed with v/o dated 05.01.2021)
MFA No.200399/2020
2
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section
173 (1) of Motor Vehicles Act praying to call for the
records and set aside the impugned judgment and award
dated 13.09.2019 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil
Judge and MACT-XII, Vijaypur in MVC No.1874/2014 and
allow the claim petition.
This appeal coming on for orders, this day, the Court
delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
1.
The claimant/appellant is before this Court
aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim petition
by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and
MACT-XII, Vijaypur in MVC No.1874/2014 vide
order dated 13.09.2019.
2.
The Tribunal upon trial coming to a conclusion
that the details of IMV report of the offending
vehicle had not been produced to establish the
involvement of the offending vehicle in the
accident. I.A.No.2/2020 has been filed by the
appellant producing the IMV report as also
certain other documents.
MFA No.200399/2020
3
3.
Sri.Basavaraj Math, learned counsel for the
appellant would submit that the said documents
could be considered by this Court to render
justice on the claim petition filed by the
claimant.
4.
A perusal of the documents indicates that the
same
are
relevant
for
the
purpose
of
consideration of the claim petition. However,
this Court cannot look into those documents
when they are not marked and without affording
opportunity to the Insurance Company to test
the veracity of the said documents by the
Insurance Company.
5.
In view thereof, the judgment and award dated
13.09.2019 passed by III Additional Senior Civil
Judge
and
MACT-XII,
Vijaypur
in
MVC
No.1874/2014 is set aside. The matter is
MFA No.200399/2020
4
remanded to the aforesaid Tribunal with liberty
to the appellant to produce the documents
produced
before
this
Court
along
with
I.A.No.1/2020 by leading further evidence and
proceed therefrom. Both the parties shall
appear before the Tribunal on 06.04.2021
without further notice.
6.
The
original
documents
which
have
been
produced
before
this
Court
along
with
I.A.No.2/2020 is directed to be returned to the
appellant subject to replacing of the same with
photocopies.
7.
In view of disposal of the above appeal,
I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2020 do not survive for
consideration and are dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Prs*
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.